Texas Penal Code 22.11 – Harassment By Persons In Certain Correctional Facilities; Harassment of Public Servant
WHAT IS HARASSMENT BY PERSONS IN CERTAIN FACILITIES; HARASSMENT OF PUBLIC SERVANT IN TEXAS?
The law against harassment of a public servant, or harassment by persons in certain facilities, also known as “the chunking statute,” makes it a third degree felony to spit on an officer, or throw blood, feces, or other bodily fluids at officers and employees of correctional or commitment facilities.
WHAT IS THE HARASSMENT BY PERSONS IN CERTAIN FACILITIES; HARASSMENT OF PUBLIC SERVANT LAW IN TEXAS?
Tex. Penal Code § 22.11. HARASSMENT BY PERSONS IN CERTAIN FACILITIES; HARASSMENT OF PUBLIC SERVANT.
(a) A person commits an offense if, with the intent to assault, harass, or alarm, the person:
(1) while imprisoned or confined in a correctional or detention facility, causes another person to contact the blood, seminal fluid, vaginal fluid, saliva, urine, or feces of the actor, any other person, or an animal;
(2) while committed to a civil commitment facility, causes:
(A) an officer or employee of the Texas Civil Commitment Office to contact the blood, seminal fluid, vaginal fluid, saliva, urine, or feces of the actor, any other person, or an animal:
(i) while the officer or employee is lawfully discharging an official duty at a civil commitment facility; or
(ii) in retaliation for or on account of an exercise of official power or performance of an official duty by the officer or employee; or
(B) a person who contracts with the state to perform a service in the facility or an employee of that person to contact the blood, seminal fluid, vaginal fluid, saliva, urine, or feces of the actor, any other person, or an animal:
(i) while the person or employee is engaged in performing a service within the scope of the contract, if the actor knows the person or employee is authorized by the state to provide the service; or
(ii) in retaliation for or on account of the person’s or employee’s performance of a service within the scope of the contract; or
(3) causes another person the actor knows to be a public servant to contact the blood, seminal fluid, vaginal fluid, saliva, urine, or feces of the actor, any other person, or an animal while the public servant is lawfully discharging an official duty or in retaliation or on account of an exercise of the public servant’s official power or performance of an official duty.
(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.
(c) If conduct constituting an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under another section of this code, the actor may be prosecuted under either section.
(e) For purposes of Subsection (a)(3), the actor is presumed to have known the person was a public servant if the person was wearing a distinctive uniform or badge indicating the person’s employment as a public servant.
WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR HARASSMENT BY PERSONS IN CERTAIN FACILITIES; HARASSMENT OF PUBLIC SERVANT IN TEXAS?
Harassment of a public servant or harassment by persons in certain facilities is a third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison.
WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR HARASSMENT BY PERSONS IN CERTAIN FACILITIES; HARASSMENT OF PUBLIC SERVANT IN TEXAS?
The punishment range for harassment of a public servant or harassment by persons in certain facilities, a third degree felony, is between two and ten years in prison, and up to a $10,000 fine.
WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR HARASSMENT BY PERSONS IN CERTAIN FACILITIES; HARASSMENT OF PUBLIC SERVANT IN TEXAS?
A person charged with harassment of a public servant, a third degree felony, may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction, for a period not to exceed ten years.
WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO HARASSMENT BY PERSONS IN CERTAIN FACILITIES; HARASSMENT OF PUBLIC SERVANT IN TEXAS?
The statute does not authorize specific defenses to harassment by persons in certain facilities or harassment of a public servant. A person accused thereof may attempt to negate one of the elements the State must prove at trial, such as the intent to “assault, harass, or alarm” the officer or facility employee by causing contact with bodily fluids.
- What if the person did not mean to spit or bleed on the public servant? Unintentionally causing bodily fluids to contact another is not an offense under this statute.In Gomez v. State, for example, a police officer responding to a disturbance call approached the defendant, who was standing in his front yard with a bleeding arm. When the officer attempted to speak to the defendant, he pushed the officer, and a struggle ensued. The officer arrested the defendant, and later noticed the defendant’s blood on his uniform and face. The appellate court reversed the defendant’s conviction, finding a lack of evidence that the defendant intended to assault, harass, or alarm the officer by causing the blood to contact him.
WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR HARASSMENT BY PERSONS IN CERTAIN FACILITIES; HARASSMENT OF PUBLIC SERVANT IN TEXAS?
The limitation period for harassment of public servants by persons in certain facilities, a third degree felony, is three years.
HARASSMENT BY PERSONS IN CERTAIN FACILITIES; HARASSMENT OF PUBLIC SERVANT IN TEXAS
The “chunking statute” recognizes that law enforcement and correctional or commitment facility employees endure high-risk situations. This law aims to protect those people by punishing certain transgressions against them, such as inmates spitting on them. While a ten-year maximum confinement may seem harsh for spitting, or causing other bodily fluids to contact a public servant, the courts have deferred to the Legislature’s determination that this punishment is appropriate for this crime.
TEXAS HARASSMENT BY PERSONS IN CERTAIN FACILITIES; HARASSMENT OF PUBLIC SERVANT COURT CASES
The case law regarding harassment of public servants or harassment by persons in certain facilities in Texas shows the recognition by appellate court justices of the legislature’s authority as lawmakers, and the justices’ duty to uphold the law as written.
- In Guerrero v. State, a prisoner threw a large amount of his liquid feces onto a correctional guard, covering her “from head to toe.” Based on the prisoner’s criminal history, which included multiple violent felony convictions, he was enhanced as an habitual offender, and sentenced to life imprisonment. He argued on appeal that the punishment was cruel and unusual.The court of appeals upheld the sentence, evaluating: (1) the gravity of the offense compared with the harshness of the penalty; (2) the sentences imposed for similar crimes in the same jurisdiction; and (3) the sentences imposed for the same crime in other jurisdictions.
- In U.S. v. Shelton, a federal court explained the seriousness of “chunking,” and the reason for such harsh consequences: “Throwing feces or urine on someone is more than mere ‘physical contact.’ Dysentery, hepatitis, HIV, and a host of other infectious diseases can be transferred by feces and urine. The victim in this type of assault is subject to worry and mental distress while awaiting the results of tests. In this case, the officer had to be treated with a ‘cocktail’ of drugs to protect against such diseases.”
- In Perez v. State, a man spat on four officers during his arrest for public intoxication. He told them he was infected with COVID-19 and that he hoped they would contract the virus and die. The trial judge sentenced the defendant to ten years’ confinement on each count, to run concurrently. The defendant argued that the punishment was cruel and unusual, but the court of appeals upheld the sentences without an Eighth Amendment analysis.
Glowing Client Reviews
Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!
I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.
Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.
I really appreciated all he did for me.
Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.
He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!
Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.
Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.
He saved my career. Forever grateful!
Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.
He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15
Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+
Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.
Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.
Contact Trey Porter Today
Request a free consultation
The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.
If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.