Texas Penal Code 25.11 – Continuous Violence Against the Family

WHAT IS CONTINUOUS VIOLENCE AGAINST FAMILY IN TEXAS?

The Texas law against continuous violence against family, also called continuous dating violence, prohibits committing assault involving family violence two or more times within a 12-month period.

Texas Penal Code 25.11 - Continuous Violence Against the Family

  • What is assault “family violence” or “domestic violence” in Texas? Texas Penal Code Section 22.01 distinguishes “simple assault” from assault involving family violence, also referred to as assault against a family member, domestic violence, or domestic abuse. Assault is considered family violence if a person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to a family member, roommate or household member, or a current or former significant other. A family violence charge exposes a person to higher penalties and collateral consequences.

WHAT IS THE CONTINUOUS VIOLENCE AGAINST FAMILY LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 25.11. CONTINUOUS VIOLENCE AGAINST FAMILY.

(a) A person commits an offense if, during a period that is 12 months or less in duration, the person two or more times engages in conduct that constitutes an offense under Section 22.01(a)(1) against another person or persons whose relationship to or association with the defendant is described by Section 71.0021(b), 71.003, or 71.005, Family Code.

(b) If the jury is the trier of fact, members of the jury are not required to agree unanimously on the specific conduct in which the defendant engaged that constituted an offense under Section 22.01(a)(1) against the person or persons described by Subsection (a), the exact date when that conduct occurred, or the county in which each instance of the conduct occurred. The jury must agree unanimously that the defendant, during a period that is 12 months or less in duration, two or more times engaged in conduct that constituted an offense under Section 22.01(a)(1) against the person or persons described by Subsection (a).

(c) A defendant may not be convicted in the same criminal action of another offense the victim of which is an alleged victim of the offense under Subsection (a) and an element of which is any conduct that is alleged as an element of the offense under Subsection (a) unless the other offense:

(1) is charged in the alternative;

(2) occurred outside the period in which the offense alleged under Subsection (a) was committed; or

(3) is considered by the trier of fact to be a lesser included offense of the offense alleged under Subsection (a).

(d) A defendant may not be charged with more than one count under Subsection (a) if all of the specific conduct that is alleged to have been engaged in is alleged to have been committed against a single victim or members of the same household, as defined by Section 71.005, Family Code.

(e) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR CONTINUOUS VIOLENCE AGAINST FAMILY IN TEXAS?

Continuous violence against family is a third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR CONTINUOUS VIOLENCE AGAINST FAMILY IN TEXAS?

The punishment range for continuous violence against family, a third degree felony, is two to ten years in prison, and a maximum $10,000 fine.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR CONTINUOUS VIOLENCE AGAINST FAMILY IN TEXAS?

A person convicted of continuous violence against family may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction, for a period not to exceed ten years.

  • Does a family violence conviction or deferred adjudication affect a person’s right to own a gun? Yes. Texas Penal Code Section 46.04 prohibits possessing a firearm within five years after a person’s release from jail or community supervision after being convicted of or placed on adjudication for assault family violence. Even an arrest for an offense involving family violence may affect a person’s right to legally own and carry a firearm. See Ex parte Isedore, No. 14-22-00161-CR (Tex. App—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 10, 2023, no pet.).Federal law likewise prohibits a person convicted of or placed on deferred adjudication for an offense involving family violence from possessing or owning a gun under federal law. See 18 U.S.C. 922(g).

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO CONTINUOUS VIOLENCE AGAINST FAMILY IN TEXAS?

A person charged with continuous violence against family may raise any of the justification defenses at trial, or attempt to negate one of the elements the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • What is the necessity defense? According to Texas Penal Code Section 9.22, conduct ordinarily considered criminal is justified under the necessity defense if: (1) the actor reasonably believes the conduct is immediately necessary to avoid imminent harm; (2) the desirability and urgency of avoiding the harm clearly outweigh, according to ordinary standards of reasonableness, the harm sought to be prevented by the law proscribing the conduct; and (3) a legislative purpose to exclude the justification claimed for the conduct does not otherwise plainly appear.Necessity requires confession and avoidance, meaning the accused must admit to the allegation, but argue it was immediately necessary to avoid harm.In Juarez v. State, a defendant was charged with aggravated assault against a peace officer after he bit the officer’s finger while resisting arrest. The defendant testified he felt like he was suffocating when the officer was on top of him, and admitted to biting the officer’s finger to get him off so he could breathe. The trial court refused to give a necessity instruction, but the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed. The jury should have been permitted to consider whether his conduct was justified as necessary under the circumstances.
  • Is there a “mutual combat” defense to assault? Texas Penal Code Section 22.06 authorizes a person charged with assault to raise the defense of consent, or “mutual combat,” if the victim and accused agreed to fight before the alleged assault occurred. The consent defense does not apply to an assault during a gang initiation.For the defense of consent to apply, the accused must show:
    • the victim, or “complainant,” effectively consented to the accused’s conduct or the accused reasonably believed that the complainant consented to the accused’s conduct; and
      • the accused’s conduct did not threaten or inflict serious bodily injury, or
      • the complainant knew the conduct was a risk of his occupation, recognized medical treatment, or a scientific experiment conducted by recognized methods.
  • What is self-defense? Texas Penal Code Section 9.31 explains a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree he reasonably believes force is immediately necessary to protect against the other’s use or attempted use of unlawful force.The accused need not prove the victim was actually using force—a person has the right to defend himself from apparent danger as he reasonably apprehends it. A person’s use of force is presumed reasonable if used against another who was:
    • unlawfully entering or attempting to enter the person’s home, vehicle, or place of business or employment;
    • unlawfully removing or attempting to remove the person from his or her home, vehicle, or place of business or employment; or
    • committing or attempting to commit aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery.

    A person may not use force in response to verbal provocation alone, or if the person provoked the victim’s initial use of force.

  • What if the accused started the fight prior to assaulting the other person? If the accused “provoked the difficulty,” he or she forfeits any claim of self-defense. Texas courts have interpreted this as more than merely starting the fight. Rather, self-defense is forfeited when an accused provoked the attack in a manner reasonably calculated to give the defendant a pretext for inflicting harm.The State must show: (1) the defendant provoked the attack through action or words; (2) the action or words were reasonably calculated to provoke the attack; and (3) the provocation was intended to give the defendant a pretext for inflicting harm. See Elizondo v. State, 487 S.W.3d 185 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016).

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CONTINUOUS VIOLENCE AGAINST FAMILY IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for continuous violence against family, a third degree felony, is three years.

CONTINUOUS VIOLENCE AGAINST FAMILY IN TEXAS

The crime of continuous violence against family requires the State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that, during a period that is 12 months or less in duration, the defendant two or more times criminally assaulted persons who (1) are family, (2) resided in the same household, or (3) dated the defendant.

TEXAS CONTINUOUS VIOLENCE AGAINST FAMILY COURT CASES 

The case law regarding continuous violence against family or continuous dating violence in Texas illustrates the statute’s application.

  • In Uhr v. State, the defendant was convicted of continuous violence against family based on two incidents against different victims. While he was pushing his baby’s mother, he was holding their 18-month-old daughter, and hit her head on the garage door track. Six months later, he assaulted his then-girlfriend. On appeal, he did not contest the second assault allegation, but argued he accidentally injured his baby, rather than caused her injury with criminal recklessness.The appellate court found sufficient evidence of recklessness. The defendant knew he was holding a toddler when he turned around to push the mother, disregarding the risk of hitting the baby’s head against the garage door. Conviction affirmed.

Resources & information

Frequently asked questions

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating