Texas Penal Code 33.022 – Electronic Access Interference
WHAT IS ELECTRONIC ACCESS INTERFERENCE IN TEXAS?
The Texas law against electronic access interference prohibits intentionally interrupting or suspending access to another’s computer system or network without permission, unless done so for a legitimate business purpose.
WHAT IS THE ELECTRONIC ACCESS INTERFERENCE LAW IN TEXAS?
Tex. Penal Code § 33.022. ELECTRONIC ACCESS INTERFERENCE.
(a) A person, other than a network provider or online service provider acting for a legitimate business purpose, commits an offense if the person intentionally interrupts or suspends access to a computer system or computer network without the effective consent of the owner.
(b) An offense under this section is a third degree felony.
(c) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the person acted with the intent to facilitate a lawful seizure or search of, or lawful access to, a computer, computer network, or computer system for a legitimate law enforcement purpose.
Tex. Penal Code § 33.03. DEFENSES.
It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under Section 33.02 or 33.022 that the actor was an officer, employee, or agent of a communication common carrier or electric utility and committed the proscribed act or acts in the course of employment while engaged in an activity that is a necessary incident to the rendition of service or to the protection of the rights or property of the communication common carrier or electric utility.
WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR ELECTRONIC ACCESS INTERFERENCE IN TEXAS?
Electronic access interference is a third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison.
WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR ELECTRONIC ACCESS INTERFERENCE IN TEXAS?
The punishment range for electronic access interference, a third degree felony, is two to ten years in prison, and a maximum $10,000 fine.
WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR ELECTRONIC ACCESS INTERFERENCE IN TEXAS?
A person charged with electronic access interference may be eligible for probation after a conviction for a term between two and five years, or deferred adjudication without a conviction for up to ten years.
WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO ELECTRONIC ACCESS INTERFERENCE IN TEXAS?
The statute authorizes a defense to electronic access interference if the person was acting with intent to facilitate lawful access to a computer, computer network, or computer system for a legitimate law enforcement purpose.
It is also an affirmative defense to electronic access interference if the person was an officer, employee, or agent of a communication common carrier or electric utility, and committed the alleged interference:
- in the course of employment; and
- the activity was necessary to:
- render services; or
- protect the rights or property of the communication common carrier or electric utility.
WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC ACCESS INTERFERENCE IN TEXAS?
The limitation period for electronic access interference is three years.
ELECTRONIC ACCESS INTERFERENCE IN TEXAS
The Texas Legislature enacted the law against electronic access interference in 2017 in response to modern cybercrimes. Using ransomware, malware, and other methods to lock people out of their devices, for example, is now a third degree felony in Texas.
Glowing Client Reviews
Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!
I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.
Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.
I really appreciated all he did for me.
Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.
He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!
Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.
Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.
He saved my career. Forever grateful!
Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.
He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15
Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+
Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.
Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.
Contact Trey Porter Today
Request a free consultation
The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.
If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.