Texas Penal Code 36.06 – Obstruction or Retaliation

WHAT IS OBSTRUCTION OR RETALIATION IN TEXAS?

A person commits obstruction or retaliation by intentionally or knowingly harming or threatening to harm another in retaliation for their service or status as a public servant, witness, prospective witness, or informant. Another way of committing retaliation is by posting the phone number or address of a public servant or the public servant’s family members on a publicly accessible website.

Texas Penal Code 36.06 - Obstruction or Retaliation

WHAT IS THE OBSTRUCTION OR RETALIATION LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 36.06. OBSTRUCTION OR RETALIATION.

(a) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally or knowingly harms or threatens to harm another by an unlawful act:

(1) in retaliation for or on account of the service or status of another as a:

(A) public servant, witness, prospective witness, or informant; or

(B) person who has reported or who the actor knows intends to report the occurrence of a crime; or

(2) to prevent or delay the service of another as a:

(A) public servant, witness, prospective witness, or informant; or

(B) person who has reported or who the actor knows intends to report the occurrence of a crime.

(a-1) A person commits an offense if the person posts on a publicly accessible website the residence address or telephone number of an individual the actor knows is a public servant or a member of a public servant’s family or household with the intent to cause harm or a threat of harm to the individual or a member of the individual’s family or household in retaliation for or on account of the service or status of the individual as a public servant.

(c) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree, except that the offense is a felony of the second degree if:

(1) the victim of the offense was harmed or threatened because of the victim’s service or status as a juror; or

(2) the actor’s conduct is described by Subsection (a-1) and results in the bodily injury of a public servant or a member of a public servant’s family or household.

(d) For purposes of Subsection (a-1), it is prima facie evidence of the intent to cause harm or a threat of harm to an individual the person knows is a public servant or a member of a public servant’s family or household if the actor:

(1) receives a written demand from the individual to not disclose the address or telephone number for reasons of safety; and

(2) either:

(A) fails to remove the address or telephone number from the publicly accessible website within a period of 48 hours after receiving the demand; or

(B) reposts the address or telephone number on the same or a different publicly accessible website, or makes the information publicly available through another medium, within a period of four years after receiving the demand, regardless of whether the individual is no longer a public servant.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR OBSTRUCTION OR RETALIATION IN TEXAS?

Obstruction or retaliation is typically a third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison. It becomes a second degree felony, punishable by two to 20 years in prison, if a person harms or threatens to harm a juror, or a public servant is injured after the person posts the public servant’s phone number or address.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR OBSTRUCTION OR RETALIATION IN TEXAS?

Obstruction or retaliation charged as a third degree felony carries between two and ten years in prison, and a maximum fine of $10,000. If it is charged as a second degree felony, the punishment range is between two and 20 years in prison, and up to a $10,000 fine.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR OBSTRUCTION OR RETALIATION IN TEXAS?

As an alternative to prison, a person charged with obstruction or retaliation is eligible for up to ten years of probation after a conviction, or up to ten years of deferred adjudication without a conviction.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO OBSTRUCTION OR RETALIATION IN TEXAS?

The action criminalized by the retaliation statute is the threat of harm with intent to inhibit public service by others. If the State does not prove the retributory element, a person cannot be convicted of retaliation. The most common defense, therefore, is negating the allegation that the threat was “for or on account of” the victim’s service or status as a public servant, witness, prospective witness, or informant.

  • When is a threat “for or on account of” another’s service or status? The fact that a threat was made to a public servant while he or she was discharging his or her duties does not, by itself, mean the threat was “for or on account of” the public servant’s service or status. The State must show the person threatened to inflict harm by an unlawful act due to the person’s status. This requires the State to correctly allege the victim’s status as an informant, public servant, witness, or prospective witness.

    In Cada v. State, the Court of Criminal Appeals illustrated the distinction between an informant, a witness, and a prospective witness. The defendant was convicted of retaliation after telling a store clerk he was “going to pay” for calling the cops. The State’s indictment alleged the victim was a “witness,” but the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction, holding the victim was an informant. 334 S.W.3d 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011).

  • What if the victim, or target of the threat, is not present or does not hear the threat? A person may be convicted of retaliation even if the target of the threat is not present to perceive the threat. Further, the threat to harm in retaliation is not required to be imminent, or direct. For example, a defendant told a social worker seeking to terminate his parental rights that he was tired of her messing with him, and he had the same thoughts as another man who killed two people in a Texas courtroom who kept messing with him. Davis v. State, 890 S.W.2d 489 (Tex. App.—Eastland 1994, no pet.).

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION OR RETALIATION IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for obstruction or retaliation, whether it is a second degree or third degree felony, is three years.

OBSTRUCTION OR RETALIATION IN TEXAS

One of the purposes of the retaliation statute is to encourage public servants, witnesses, prospective witnesses, and informants to perform vital public duties without fear of retribution. Those public duties may include reporting criminal activities, testifying in official proceedings, or cooperating with the government in a criminal investigation. Threats to those protected by the statute are based not only on the language used but the context in which they are uttered. Veiled threats, imminent or not, constitute retaliation.

TEXAS OBSTRUCTION OR RETALIATION COURT CASES

The case law regarding obstruction or retaliation in Texas shows there are several alternative ways of committing the offense. Courts have also discussed the types of threats prohibited by the law against retaliation, and have concluded the threat is not required to be verbal, nor does it need to be imminent.

  • What is a threat under the obstruction or retaliation law? A threat occurs if a person gives some sign, warning, or otherwise communicates an intent to inflict loss, disadvantage, or injury. A threat may be verbal, non-verbal, or a combination of the two. Actually harming someone and threatening to harm someone may arise from the same act, occur simultaneously, or in sequence. For example, making a “finger gun” gesture at a police officer amounted to a threat when the defendant made other threatening statements and asked about the police officer’s family members. Barnes v. State, 631 S.W.3d 281 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020, pet. ref’d).

Resources & information

Frequently asked questions

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating