Texas Penal Code 30.05 – Criminal Trespass

Name: Trey Porter Law
Brand: Trey Porter Law
Rating: 5 (150 reviews)

FAQ HUB

/ Misdemeanor Charges

/ Texas Penal Code 30.05 – Criminal Trespass

13 MIN READ

Texas Penal Code 30.05 – Criminal Trespass

WHAT IS CRIMINAL TRESPASS IN TEXAS?

Criminal trespass is entering another’s property without consent, or remaining on or in another’s property after being told to leave.

What “entry” is required to be charged with criminal trespass? eTexas Penal Code Section 30.05 defines “entry” as “the intrusion of the entire body.” The Court of Criminal Appeals observed in State v. Meru that the criminal trespass law requires a person to enter a location completely, while the entry punished by Texas burglary statute includes the intrusion of “any part of the body,” or “any physical object connected with the body.”

WHAT IS THE CRIMINAL TRESPASS LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 30.05. CRIMINAL TRESPASS.

(a) A person commits an offense if the person enters or remains on or in property of another, including residential land, agricultural land, a recreational vehicle park, a building, a general residential operation operating as a residential treatment center, or an aircraft or other vehicle, without effective consent and the person:

(1) had notice that the entry was forbidden; or

(2) received notice to depart but failed to do so.

. . .

(c) A person may provide notice that firearms are prohibited on the property by posting a sign at each entrance to the property that:

(1) includes language that is identical to or substantially similar to the following: “Pursuant to Section 30.05, Penal Code (criminal trespass), a person may not enter this property with a firearm”;

(2) includes the language described by Subdivision (1) in both English and Spanish;

(3) appears in contrasting colors with block letters at least one inch in height; and

(4) is displayed in a conspicuous manner clearly visible to the public.

(d) Subject to Subsection (d-3), an offense under this section is:

(1) a Class B misdemeanor, except as provided by Subdivisions (2) and (3);

(2) a Class C misdemeanor, except as provided by Subdivision (3), if the offense is committed:

(A) on agricultural land and within 100 feet of the boundary of the land; or

(B) on residential land and within 100 feet of a protected freshwater area; and

(3) a Class A misdemeanor if:

(A) the offense is committed:

(i) in a habitation or a shelter center;

(ii) on a Superfund site; or

(iii) on or in a critical infrastructure facility;

(B) the offense is committed on or in property of an institution of higher education and it is shown on the trial of the offense that the person has previously been convicted of:

(i) an offense under this section relating to entering or remaining on or in property of an institution of higher education; or

(ii) an offense under Section 51.204(b)(1), Education Code, relating to trespassing on the grounds of an institution of higher education;

(D) the offense is committed on the property of or within a general residential operation operating as a residential treatment center.

(d-1) For the purposes of Subsection (d)(3)(B), a person has previously been convicted of an offense described by that paragraph if the person was adjudged guilty of the offense or entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere in return for a grant of deferred adjudication community supervision, regardless of whether the sentence for the offense was ever imposed or whether the sentence was probated and the person was subsequently discharged from deferred adjudication community supervision.

(d-2) At the punishment stage of a trial in which the attorney representing the state seeks the increase in punishment provided by Subsection (d)(3)(B), the defendant may raise the issue as to whether, at the time of the instant offense or the previous offense, the defendant was engaging in speech or expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or Section 8, Article I, Texas Constitution. If the defendant proves the issue in the affirmative by a preponderance of the evidence, the increase in punishment provided by Subsection (d)(3)(B) does not apply.

(d-3) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $200 if the person enters the property, land, or building with a firearm or other weapon and the sole basis on which entry on the property or land or in the building was forbidden is that entry with a firearm or other weapon was forbidden, except that the offense is a Class A misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that, after entering the property, land, or building with the firearm or other weapon, the actor:

(1) personally received from the owner of the property or another person with apparent authority to act for the owner notice that entry with a firearm or other weapon was forbidden, as given through:

(A) oral or written communication by the owner or someone with apparent authority to act for the owner; or

(B) if the actor is unable to reasonably understand the notice described by Paragraph (A), other personal notice that is reasonable under the circumstances; and

(2) subsequently failed to depart.

(e) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor at the time of the offense was:

(1) a firefighter or emergency medical services personnel acting in the lawful discharge of an official duty under exigent circumstances;

(2) a person who was:

(A) an employee or agent of:

(i) an electric utility, as defined by Section 31.002, Utilities Code;

(ii) a telecommunications provider, as defined by Section 51.002, Utilities Code;

(iii) a video service provider or cable service provider, as defined by Section 66.002, Utilities Code;

(iv) a gas utility, as defined by Section 101.003, Utilities Code, which for the purposes of this subsection includes a municipally owned utility as defined by that section;

(v) a gas utility, as defined by Section 121.001, Utilities Code;

(vi) a pipeline used for the transportation or sale of oil, gas, or related products; or

(vii) an electric cooperative or municipally owned utility, as defined by Section 11.003, Utilities Code; and

(B) performing a duty within the scope of that employment or agency; or

(3) a person who was:

(A) employed by or acting as agent for an entity that had, or that the person reasonably believed had, effective consent or authorization provided by law to enter the property; and

(B) performing a duty within the scope of that employment or agency.

(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:

(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun was forbidden; and

(2) the person was carrying:

(A) a license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a handgun; and

(B) a handgun:

(i) in a concealed manner; or

(ii) in a holster.

(f-1) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:

(1) the basis on which entry on the property was forbidden is that entry with a firearm or firearm ammunition was forbidden;

(2) the actor is:

(A) an owner of an apartment in a condominium regime governed by Chapter 81, Property Code;

(B) an owner of a condominium unit governed by Chapter 82, Property Code;

(D) a guest of a tenant of an owner described by Paragraph (A) or (B);

(3) the actor:

(A) carries or stores a firearm or firearm ammunition in the condominium apartment or unit owner’s apartment or unit;

(B) carries a firearm or firearm ammunition directly en route to or from the condominium apartment or unit owner’s apartment or unit;

(C) carries a firearm or firearm ammunition directly en route to or from the actor’s vehicle located in a parking area provided for residents or guests of the condominium property; or

(D) carries or stores a firearm or firearm ammunition in the actor’s vehicle located in a parking area provided for residents or guests of the condominium property; and

(4) the actor is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing a firearm or firearm ammunition.

(f-2) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:

(1) the basis on which entry on a leased premises governed by Chapter 92, Property Code, was forbidden is that entry with a firearm or firearm ammunition was forbidden;

(2) the actor is a tenant of the leased premises or the tenant’s guest;

(3) the actor:

(A) carries or stores a firearm or firearm ammunition in the tenant’s rental unit;

(B) carries a firearm or firearm ammunition directly en route to or from the tenant’s rental unit;

(C) carries a firearm or firearm ammunition directly en route to or from the actor’s vehicle located in a parking area provided for tenants or guests by the landlord of the leased premises; or

(D) carries or stores a firearm or firearm ammunition in the actor’s vehicle located in a parking area provided for tenants or guests by the landlord of the leased premises; and

(4) the actor is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing a firearm or firearm ammunition.

(f-3) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:

(1) the basis on which entry on a leased premises governed by Chapter 94, Property Code, was forbidden is that entry with a firearm or firearm ammunition was forbidden;

(2) the actor is a tenant of a manufactured home lot or the tenant’s guest;

(3) the actor:

(A) carries or stores a firearm or firearm ammunition in the tenant’s manufactured home;

(B) carries a firearm or firearm ammunition directly en route to or from the tenant’s manufactured home;

(C) carries a firearm or firearm ammunition directly en route to or from the actor’s vehicle located in a parking area provided for tenants or tenants’ guests by the landlord of the leased premises; or

(D) carries or stores a firearm or firearm ammunition in the actor’s vehicle located in a parking area provided for tenants or tenants’ guests by the landlord of the leased premises; and

(4) the actor is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing a firearm or firearm ammunition.

(f-4) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:

(1) the conduct occurred on hotel property, and the basis on which entry on that property was forbidden is that entry with a firearm or firearm ammunition was forbidden;

(2) the actor is a guest of a hotel, as defined by Section 2155.101, Occupations Code; and

(3) the actor:

(A) carries or stores a firearm or firearm ammunition in the actor’s hotel room;

(B) carries a firearm or firearm ammunition directly en route to or from the hotel or the actor’s hotel room;

(C) carries a firearm or firearm ammunition directly en route to or from the actor’s vehicle located on the hotel property, including a vehicle in a parking area provided for hotel guests; or

(D) carries or stores a firearm or firearm ammunition in the actor’s vehicle located on the hotel property, including a vehicle in a parking area provided for hotel guests.

(g) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor entered a railroad switching yard or any part of a railroad switching yard and was at that time an employee or a representative of employees exercising a right under the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. Section 151 et seq.).

(h) At the punishment stage of a trial in which the attorney representing the state seeks the increase in punishment provided by Subsection (d)(3)(A)(iii), the defendant may raise the issue as to whether the defendant entered or remained on or in a critical infrastructure facility as part of a peaceful or lawful assembly, including an attempt to exercise rights guaranteed by state or federal labor laws. If the defendant proves the issue in the affirmative by a preponderance of the evidence, the increase in punishment provided by Subsection (d)(3)(A)(iii) does not apply.

(i) This section does not apply if:

(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun or other weapon was forbidden; and

(2) the actor at the time of the offense was a peace officer, including a commissioned peace officer of a recognized state, or a special investigator under Article 2.122, Code of Criminal Procedure, regardless of whether the peace officer or special investigator was engaged in the actual discharge of an official duty while carrying the weapon.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR CRIMINAL TRESPASS IN TEXAS?

By default, criminal trespass is a Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in county jail.

Criminal trespass is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail, if the person carries a deadly weapon while trespassing, or the trespass location is a:

“habitation,” or home;
Superfund site on the National Priorities List or state registry;
critical infrastructure facility, unless the person was participating in “a peaceful or lawful assembly,” in which case the trespass remains a Class B misdemeanor;
college, university, or other institution of higher education, and the person has previously been convicted of trespassing onto property of the same character, unless the accused shows by a preponderance of the evidence the trespass was for engaging in expressive speech or conduct protected by the First Amendment;
residential treatment center.

Criminal trespass is a Class C misdemeanor, punishable by a maximum fine of $500, if a person trespasses onto agricultural land within 100 feet of the boundary, or on residential land within 100 feet of a protected freshwater area.

Texas law increases the penalty classification for criminal trespass to the next highest category, or to minimum confinement of 180 days in jail for a Class A misdemeanor, if a person commits the offense in an area subject to an emergency evacuation order, or under a declaration of a state of disaster by the governor or president of the United States. See Tex. Penal Code § 12.50.

Texas Penal Code Section 12.501 increases the penalty classification to the next highest category if the offense is committed against a public servant, a member of the public servant’s family or household, or property owned or controlled by a public servant, in retaliation for or on account of the public servant’s status.

Can a person be charged with criminal trespass based on carrying a firearm? Yes. Texas Penal Code Section 30.05(c) permits private businesses and other property owners to post conspicuous warning signs that carrying firearms on premises is forbidden. If the sole basis for the criminal trespass charge is entry onto such property with a firearm or other weapon, it is a Class C misdemeanor, punishable by a reduced maximum fine of $200.However, if the person in possession of the firearm is told by the owner or other person with authority to leave, and the person refuses to leave, the trespass charge becomes a Class A misdemeanor. Peace officers and other law enforcement cannot be prohibited from carrying a firearm under the criminal trespass statute.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR CRIMINAL TRESPASS IN TEXAS?

Class C misdemeanors are only punishable by a fine of up to $500. However, if a person is charged with criminal trespass with a firearm as a Class C misdemeanor, the maximum fine is $200. Criminal trespass charged as a Class B misdemeanor carries up to 180 days in jail, and a maximum fine of $2,000. A person charged with Class A misdemeanor criminal trespass faces up to one year in jail, and a maximum fine of $4,000.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR CRIMINAL TRESPASS IN TEXAS?

A person charged with a Class C misdemeanor criminal trespass is eligible for deferred adjudication for a maximum period of 180 days. If convicted, the person will only be required to pay the fine assessed, without being subjected to probation or further conditions.

A person charged with a Class A or Class B misdemeanor criminal trespass is eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication to avoid a conviction, for up to two years.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO CRIMINAL TRESPASS IN TEXAS?

Statutory defenses exist for firefighters, emergency personnel, and utility workers performing official duties, and for railroad switching yard employees or representatives of employees who enter a switching yard in exercise of a right under the Railway Labor Act.

Additional defenses are authorized if the sole basis for the criminal trespass charge is entering the premises with a firearm, despite signs posted forbidding firearm possession.

Can hotels, apartment and condominium complexes, and manufactured home communities prohibit firearm possession on premises? Yes, but the law creates several defenses, so an ultimate conviction is unlikely. A person who ignores a firearm prohibition may be arrested for a Class C misdemeanor. However, tenants and hotel guests may attempt to show they merely stored the firearm in their room or unit, were carrying the firearm directly to or from their room or unit to their vehicle, or stored it in their vehicle on the property.

Does a license to carry protect a person from criminal charges for firearm possession in Texas? Yes, under certain circumstances. Holders of a license to carry a handgun arrested for criminal trespass by carrying a gun onto property prohibiting firearms may raise a defense if they show the gun was either holstered, or concealed while on the property. However, if license holders are notified handguns are prohibited on property, even for those with a license to carry, they may still be punished under Texas Penal Code Sections 30.06 or 30.07 if they refuse to leave.

Is a criminal trespass warning required before a person is charged with criminal trespass? The law only requires notice that entry is forbidden, or that a person must depart from the location. Notice includes any oral or written communication by someone with authority, a fence or other enclosure designed to exclude intruders, or signs on the property.In Salazar v. State, the Court of Criminal Appeals held society has inherent notice of forbidden entry into another’s habitation. For locations generally open to the public, a written criminal trespass warning is one way to give notice, but is not required, as long as a person was told to leave and not return by someone authorized to do so.

Does the First Amendment protect freedom of speech and assembly in locations open to the public? The criminal trespass statute recognizes certain defenses for peaceful protests, and other expressive conduct. For example, those charged with Class A misdemeanor criminal trespass onto college or university grounds, or onto a critical infrastructure, may show they were engaging in protected speech or expressive conduct to reduce their punishment to a Class B misdemeanor range. But the First Amendment protections are not limitless.

What are the risks of trespassing in Texas? Texas Penal Code Sections 9.41 and 9.42 permit victims of crimes such as burglary and criminal trespass to use force, including deadly force, in defense of property.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CRIMINAL TRESPASS IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for criminal trespass is two years.

CRIMINAL TRESPASS IN TEXAS

Texas law prohibits entering another’s property without permission, or remaining on another’s property after being told to leave.

TEXAS CRIMINAL TRESPASS COURT CASES

The case law regarding criminal trespass in Texas illustrates the statute’s constitutionality.

In Zarsky v. State, the defendant participated in an anti-abortion protest. He stood in the parking lot of a clinic in an office complex, eight feet from the front door. The office complex owner told the defendant to leave, but he refused. Shortly thereafter, he was arrested for criminal trespass, and subsequently convicted. The appellate court affirmed, rejecting his First Amendment claim. And just because the business was “open to the public” does not mean it assumed the functional attributes of public property devoted to public use.

Did like a post? Share it with:

REQUEST A FREE CONSULTATION

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, it’s time to start building your defense.

Texas Transportation Code 550.022 – Accident Involving Damage to Vehicle (Failure to Give Information, resulting in Damage to Vehicle)

Texas Penal Code 36.03 – Coercion of Public Servant or Voter

Texas Penal Code 32.34 – Fraudulent Transfer of a Motor Vehicle

Let's Get Legal on YouTube!

Tune In for Legal Tips, Laughs, and Learning

Explore More Legal Adventures: Discover Related Posts

Discover Related Posts

DWI 1st Offense in Texas

A first-time DWI charge in Texas is a Class B Misdemeanor....

DWI 2nd Offense in Texas

The penalties for a second DWI offense (DWI-Repeat Offender) are severe....

Driving While License Suspended Or Invalid In Texas

Driving While License Invalid (DWLI) is a criminal offense in Texas....

Does a Class C Misdemeanor Stay on your Record in Texas?

Alcohol is available for in-store purchase beginning at 7 a.m. Monday...

Is Street Racing Illegal in Texas?

Alcohol is available for in-store purchase beginning at 7 a.m. Monday...

What is Speeding in Texas?

Speeding is a Class C misdemeanor punishable by a maximum $500...

Explore Our Legal Categories

constitutional rights

CRIMINAL CHARGES

DRIVER'S LICENSES

DWI CHARGES

EXPUNGEMENT

FELONY CHARGES

MISDEMEANOR CHARGES

PROBATION

Testimonials

What our clients think about us

M. Adams

Exceptional Defense Attorneys and firm.
I had the pleasure of being represented by Trey Porter Law. Attorney Joseph Strickland worked with me directly and was wit me at every court appearance and I couldn't be more satisfied with the outcome. From the outset, they set clear expectations on how they could help me avoid jail time for my DWI charge.

What truly stood out was their unwavering support throughout the entire process. They were always accessible, promptly addressing any questions I had. Ms. Aisley would answer my call and respond to my questions on the spot. This was especially crucial when my school and potential employers raised concerns about my pending charges. Joseph Strickland provided guidance on how to navigate these external challenges, showcasing their commitment to their clients beyond the courtroom.

Their professionalism, transparent communication, and dedication to my case made a significant impact, and I am grateful for the positive resolution they achieved. I highly recommend Trey Porter Law Firm for anyone in need of a skilled and supportive defense attorney and team.

C. Pollock

After a search of attorneys in my area I sought out Trey Porter Law Firm, impressed by the detailed information provided on the website and resounding client endorsements. From the introductory phone call, direct meeting, subsequent calls/emails/texts, and throughout my court appearance and disposition, all dealings have been exceptional. Everyone on the team has been friendly and responsive, while still being highly professional. I also very much appreciate the proactive approach taken throughout my case.

J. Givens

Mr. Porter an amazing attorney, he help me get through my situation swiftly and professionally as well as save me time and money in the process. Working with Mr. Porter was a pleasure, he kept me well informed and updated throughout the whole process which made things so much easier for me to understand. Mr. Porter and his team took the stress out of stressful situation. Mr. Porter and his team was always easy to contact and return my phone calls and emails promptly. I cannot give enough praise to Mr. Porter and his team. I had another attorney in the beginning who wad basically going to railroad me. I would definitely recommend Mr. Trey Porter again and again. If you’re looking for a great attorney who is affordable and knowledgeable and will fight for you, Trey Porter is the attorney to choose. Definitely a five star attorney.

J. Franklin

Trey and his staff are great and make sure to help you with all your questions to get through the process. Trey worked out the best outcome for my issue and got me an opportunity to get my charge expunged. Trey and his team made a negative experience end on a positive note. Truly recommend this law firm for your legal issues.

J. McKibbon

I would like to thank Trey Porter and his team regarding my DUI case. I truly could not have expected a better outcome regarding my case. This outcome only happened because of his expert knowledge and dedication to his profession. Trey really took time to explain every step of the process to me which really helped me make critical decisions on how to proceed. I am lucky to have come across his name and will only refer people to Mr. Porter regarding DUI offenses. Trey, I want to thank you publicly. Your expert handling of my D.U.I. got my case reduced to an outcome I was very pleased with. Nothing against my driving record, no loss of license and I’m positive this wouldn’t have turned out so well without you. Thanks for your hard work, empathy and responsiveness it really meant a lot to me.

R. Valdez

We hired Trey Porter to assist us last year. From the initial consultation up to and including the court hearing, Trey had a straight forward approach to the situation at hand. He explained everything along the way and was available at any time to discuss/answer any questions we had either by phone/text/email. With his experience and professionalism, we obtained the best outcome possible. We would highly recommend Trey Porter with no hesitation whatsoever. Five stars is definitely not enough!

B. Cantu

I highly recommend Trey Porter! He is very professional and attentive to each situation at hand. He does not beat around the bush. Straight forward and explains things very well. Easy to work with. Contacts you before you have to ever contact him. Detailed oriented. Driven to get you the best deal possible in your situation. Him and his staff were absolutely amazing for my situation. Thank you!

B. Patel

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients. He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

D. Lopez

Mr. Porter was exceptional! He answered all my questions, was thorough throughout my case. Really pushed to go above and beyond to get us the results we were needing. Excellent professional service and as a professional I can definitely say I recommend him.

C. Jef

100/100
Excellent experience with Mr Porter and TPL law offices. They fought for me and they won! I hired Mr Porter after an embarrassing incident. My license and employment were on the line. The office had excellent communication and personal service — even through text message! Totally recommend Trey Porter 100/100!

T. Royal

5 STAR!
I hired Mr. Porter to represent my son in a DUI case. I was worried a conviction would ruin his future. Mr. Porter and the whole office were friendly, thorough, and poised throughout. They respond to text and calls almost instantly. We are just finishing the expunction process after the case was dismissed!!! I am grateful to Mr. Porter and recommend him to one and all. Excellent from start to finish. Thank you TPL!

A. Renaud

Winning
I won with Attorney Trey Porter! Had a criminal DWI .15 charge, small accident, but no injuries. This was my first criminal charge of my life. Mr. Porter was great to talk to — as was the entire office staff and other attorneys. Everyone was SO NICE! 9 long months passed and my charge was dismissed. No probation. No conviction. This experience was well worth the money. I recommend Trey Porter, Attorney at Law.

Unlock the Perks of Choosing Us!

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2ND

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Request
a free consultation

Contact Trey Porter Today

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation