Texas Health & Safety Code Offenses 481.124 – Possession or Transport of Certain Chemicals with Intent to Manufacture Controlled Substance

WHAT IS POSSESSION OR TRANSPORT OF CERTAIN CHEMICALS WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE IN TEXAS?

The Texas law against possession or transport of certain chemicals with intent to manufacture a controlled substance prohibits transporting or otherwise having care, custody, control, or management of a chemical precursor or immediate precursor primarily used in the manufacture of a controlled substance.

Texas Health & Safety Code Offenses 481.124 – Possession or Transport of Certain Chemicals with Intent to Manufacture Controlled Substance

  • What is a “chemical precursor” in Texas? Texas Health and Safety Code Section 481.002 lists specific chemical precursors:
    • Methylamine;
    • Ethylamine;
    • D-lysergic acid;
    • Ergotamine tartrate;
    • Diethyl malonate;
    • Malonic acid;
    • Ethyl malonate;
    • Barbituric acid;
    • Piperidine;
    • N-acetylanthranilic acid;
    • Pyrrolidine;
    • Phenylacetic acid;
    • Anthranilic acid;
    • Ephedrine;
    • Pseudoephedrine;
    • Norpseudoephedrine; or
    • Phenylpropanolamine.
  • What is an “immediate precursor” in Texas? Texas Health and Safety Code Section 481.002 defines immediate precursor as: (1) a substance the director finds to be and by rule designates as being a principal compound commonly used in the manufacture of a controlled substance; (2) a substance that is likely to be used in the manufacture of a controlled substance; or (3) a substance the control of which is necessary to prevent, curtail, or limit the manufacture of a controlled substance.
  • What is the difference between Schedules I, II, III, IV, and V and the penalty groups of controlled substances? Controlled substances are divided into five “schedules” based on potential for abuse or addiction, which dictate the rules medical professionals must follow in prescribing medications listed in each schedule. Schedule I, for example, are the most addictive substances, and may generally not be prescribed. Substances in Schedule I are also typically in Penalty Group 1, and are considered illegal under most circumstances.Controlled substances are divided into “penalty groups” for determining criminal classification and penalties.

WHAT IS THE POSSESSION OR TRANSPORT OF CERTAIN CHEMICALS WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.124. OFFENSE: POSSESSION OR TRANSPORT OF CERTAIN CHEMICALS WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE.

(a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to unlawfully manufacture a controlled substance, the person possesses or transports:

(1) anhydrous ammonia;

(2) an immediate precursor; or

(3) a chemical precursor or an additional chemical substance named as a precursor by the director under Section 481.077(b)(1).

(b) For purposes of this section, an intent to unlawfully manufacture the controlled substance methamphetamine is presumed if the actor possesses or transports:

(1) anhydrous ammonia in a container or receptacle that is not designed and manufactured to lawfully hold or transport anhydrous ammonia;

(2) lithium metal removed from a battery and immersed in kerosene, mineral spirits, or similar liquid that prevents or retards hydration; or

(3) in one container, vehicle, or building, phenylacetic acid, or more than nine grams, three containers packaged for retail sale, or 300 tablets or capsules of a product containing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine, and:

(A) anhydrous ammonia;

(B) at least three of the following categories of substances commonly used in the manufacture of methamphetamine:

(i) lithium or sodium metal or red phosphorus, iodine, or iodine crystals;

(ii) lye, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, or muriatic acid;

(iii) an organic solvent, including ethyl ether, alcohol, or acetone;

(iv) a petroleum distillate, including naphtha, paint thinner, or charcoal lighter fluid; or

(v) aquarium, rock, or table salt; or

(C) at least three of the following items:

(i) an item of equipment subject to regulation under Section 481.080, if the person is not a registrant; or

(ii) glassware, a plastic or metal container, tubing, a hose, or other item specially designed, assembled, or adapted for use in the manufacture, processing, analyzing, storing, or concealing of methamphetamine.

(c) For purposes of this section, a substance is presumed to be anhydrous ammonia if the substance is in a container or receptacle that is:

(1) designed and manufactured to lawfully hold or transport anhydrous ammonia; or

(2) not designed and manufactured to lawfully hold or transport anhydrous ammonia, if:

(A) a properly administered field test of the substance using a testing device or instrument designed and manufactured for that purpose produces a positive result for anhydrous ammonia; or

(B) a laboratory test of a water solution of the substance produces a positive result for ammonia.

(d) An offense under this section is:

(1) a felony of the second degree if the controlled substance is listed in Penalty Group 1, 1-A, or 1-B;

(2) a felony of the third degree if the controlled substance is listed in Penalty Group 2;

(3) a state jail felony if the controlled substance is listed in Penalty Group 3 or 4; or

(4) a Class A misdemeanor if the controlled substance is listed in a schedule by an action of the commissioner under this chapter but not listed in a penalty group.

(e) If conduct constituting an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under another section of this code, the actor may be prosecuted under either section or under both sections.

(f) This section does not apply to a chemical precursor exempted by the director under Section 481.077(b)(2) from the requirements of that section.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR POSSESSION OR TRANSPORT OF CERTAIN CHEMICALS WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE IN TEXAS?

The penalty classification for possession or transport of certain chemicals with intent to manufacture a controlled substance depends on the substance the accused intends to manufacture.

  • Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail, if:
    • the intended controlled substance is listed in a schedule, but not in a penalty group;
  • State jail felony, punishable by 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, if:
    • the intended controlled substance is listed in Penalty Group 3 or 4;
  • Third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison, if:
    • the intended controlled substance is listed in Penalty Group 2;
  • Second degree felony, punishable by two to 20 years in prison, if:
    • the intended controlled substance is listed in Penalty Group 1, 1-A, or 1-B.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR POSSESSION OR TRANSPORT OF CERTAIN CHEMICALS WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE IN TEXAS?

The punishment range for possessing or transporting certain chemicals with the intent to manufacture a controlled substance corresponds to the penalty classification, which is guided by the respective penalty group into which the intended controlled substance falls.

  • Second degree felony (intended controlled substance in PG 1, 1-A, or 1-B):
    • two to 20 years in prison, maximum $10,000 fine;
  • Third degree felony (intended controlled substance in PG 2):
    • two to ten years in prison, maximum $10,000 fine;
  • State jail felony (intended controlled substance in PG 3 or 4):
    • 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, maximum $10,000 fine;
  • Class A misdemeanor (intended controlled substance not listed in a penalty group):
    • up to one year in jail, maximum $4,000 fine.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR POSSESSION OR TRANSPORT OF CERTAIN CHEMICALS WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE IN TEXAS?

A person charged with possession or transport of certain chemicals with intent to manufacture a controlled substance as a Class A misdemeanor is eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction, for a period not to exceed two years.

The community supervision period for a state jail felony charge of possession or transport of certain chemicals with intent to manufacture a controlled substance ranges between two and five years, with the possibility of extending supervision for up to ten years.

If charged as a third degree felony, the probation term may not exceed five years, while deferred adjudication may be for a period of up to ten years. Community supervision for possession or transport of certain chemicals with intent to manufacture a controlled substance charged as a second degree felony may not exceed ten years.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO POSSESSION OR TRANSPORT OF CERTAIN CHEMICALS WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE IN TEXAS?

The statute does not apply to chemical precursors specifically exempted under Texas Health and Safety Code Section 481.077, and by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration’s Chemical Handler’s Manual. A person accused of possession or transport of certain chemicals with intent to manufacture controlled substances may also attempt to negate at least one of the elements the State must prove at trial.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR POSSESSION OR TRANSPORT OF CERTAIN CHEMICALS WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for possession or transport of certain chemicals with intent to manufacture a controlled substance categorized as a felony is three years. If punishable as a misdemeanor, the limitation period is two years.

POSSESSION OR TRANSPORT OF CERTAIN CHEMICALS WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE IN TEXAS

Texas law punishes possessing and transporting chemicals necessary to manufacture controlled substances, such as ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, as a felony under most circumstances.

TEXAS POSSESSION OR TRANSPORT OF CERTAIN CHEMICALS WITH INTENT TO MANUFACTURE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE COURT CASES

The case law regarding possession or transport of certain chemicals with intent to manufacture a controlled substance in Texas illustrates the statute’s application.

  • In Calbat v. State, police were investigating a suspected methamphetamine lab on the defendant’s property. Upon executing a search warrant for a trailer next to the defendant’s home, they found Sudafed, plastic tubing, batteries, broken glass pipes, engine starter fluid, hydrogen peroxide, and other meth cooking materials. Police also found methamphetamine residue. Because of the large amount of Sudafed, or pseudoephedrine, the defendant was convicted of possessing chemicals with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, a controlled substance in Penalty Group 1, and the appellate court affirmed.
FAQs; Knowledge is power. Get honest answers now.

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating