Texas Penal Code 20.02 – Unlawful Restraint

WHAT IS UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT IN TEXAS?

A person who restricts another’s movement without consent commits the offense of unlawful restraint, also referred to as false imprisonment.

Texas Penal Code 20.02 - Unlawful Restraint

WHAT IS THE UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 20.02. UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT.

(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly restrains another person.

(b) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that:

(1) the person restrained was a child younger than 14 years of age;

(2) the actor was a relative of the child; and

(3) the actor’s sole intent was to assume lawful control of the child.

(c) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor, except that the offense is:

(1) a state jail felony if the person restrained was a child younger than 17 years of age;

(2) a felony of the third degree if:

(A) the actor recklessly exposes the victim to a substantial risk of serious bodily injury;

(B) the actor restrains an individual the actor knows is a public servant while the public servant is lawfully discharging an official duty or in retaliation or on account of an exercise of official power or performance of an official duty as a public servant; or

(C) the actor while in custody restrains any other person; or

(3) notwithstanding Subdivision (2)(B), a felony of the second degree if the actor restrains an individual the actor knows is a peace officer or judge while the officer or judge is lawfully discharging an official duty or in retaliation or on account of an exercise of official power or performance of an official duty as a peace officer or judge.

(d) It is no offense to detain or move another under this section when it is for the purpose of effecting a lawful arrest or detaining an individual lawfully arrested.

(e) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that:

(1) the person restrained was a child who is 14 years of age or older and younger than 17 years of age;

(2) the actor does not restrain the child by force, intimidation, or deception; and

(3) the actor is not more than three years older than the child.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT IN TEXAS?

The penalty classification for unlawful restraint begins at a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail, and is enhanced depending on the severity of the conduct:

  • State jail felony, punishable by 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, if:
    • the victim is younger than 17 years;
  • Third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison, if:
    • the victim is exposed to a substantial risk of serious bodily injury;
    • the person restrains a public servant lawfully discharging an official duty, or in retaliation for or on account of the public servant’s exercise of an official duty; or
    • the person restrains another while in custody;
  • Second degree felony, punishable by two to 20 years in prison, if:
    • the person restrains a peace officer lawfully discharging an official duty, or in retaliation for or on account of the peace officer’s exercise of an official duty.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT IN TEXAS?

A person charged with unlawful restraint faces anywhere from a year in county jail to 20 years in prison, depending on the penalty classification of the offense.

  • Without any other aggravating factors, unlawful restraint is a Class A misdemeanor, with a maximum jail sentence of one year, and up to a $4,000 fine.
  • If the victim was under 17 years of age, unlawful restraint is a state jail felony, which carries between 180 days and two years in a state jail facility, and a maximum fine of $10,000.
  • If the victim was a public servant lawfully discharging an official duty, the victim was exposed to a substantial risk of serious bodily injury, or the person restrained another while in custody:
    • Third degree felony, with a punishment range of two to ten years in prison, and a maximum fine of $10,000.
  • If the victim was a peace officer lawfully discharging an official duty, or the restraint was due to the peace officer’s official status or service:
    • Second degree felony, with a punishment range of two to 20 years in prison, and a maximum fine of $10,000.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT IN TEXAS?

A person charged with unlawful restraint may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction. The minimum and maximum periods of supervision vary, depending on the offense category:

  • Class A misdemeanor: maximum supervision term of two years;
  • State jail felony: community supervision term between two and five years;
  • Third degree and second degree felonies: community supervision term between two and ten years.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT IN TEXAS?

The statute advises “[i]t is no offense” for a peace officer to lawfully detain or arrest someone. It also creates an affirmative defense for an accused who is 19 years old or younger, and restrains a child between ages 14 and 16 without using force, intimidation, or deception.

  • Can a parent unlawfully restrain his or her own child in Texas? If a parent or other relative of a child younger than 14 restrains the child for the sole purpose of gaining lawful control, it is an affirmative defense to an unlawful restraint charge. Parents are not often charged with unlawful restraint, given the multitude of laws protecting the parent-child relationship.The Texas Penal Code permits parents to use reasonable and necessary force to discipline their children, and the Texas Family Code likewise permits a parent to use corporal punishment as reasonable discipline.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for Class A misdemeanor unlawful restraint is two years. The limitation period for unlawful restraint categorized as a state jail felony, third degree, and second degree felony is three years.

UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT IN TEXAS

The law against unlawful restraint, or false imprisonment, prohibits the intentional or knowing restriction of another’s movement without consent, whether by force, intimidation, deception, or any other means.

TEXAS UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT COURT CASES

The case law regarding unlawful restraint in Texas demonstrates the various ways in which the crime is committed.

  • In Walton v. State, a defendant asked his girlfriend, the victim, to get into his truck to talk. He sped off once she got in, and despite the victim’s repeated requests to stop and let her out, he refused. Instead, he told her they were going to die. The defendant was speeding, swerving in and out of traffic, and nearly sideswiped one driver. The defendant was convicted of unlawful restraint by recklessly exposing the victim to a substantial risk of serious bodily injury, a third degree felony, and the appellate court affirmed. Walton v. State, 641 S.W.3d 861 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2022, pet. ref’d) abrogated on other grounds by Anastassov v. State, No. PD-0848-20 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 5, 2022).
  • In Smitherman v. State, the defendant was a long-time friend of the 13-year-old victim’s family. He followed her into an RV on their property, and started saying vulgar and sexual things. When she got up to leave, he grabbed her arm, and told her he would tell her mother he saw her with a vape pen three days earlier if she left. Not wanting to get in trouble, she sat back down. When he eventually grabbed her face, she punched him, yelled at him, and he left. He was convicted of state jail felony unlawful restraint, and the appellate court affirmed. His restraint was without the victim’s consent because it was by intimidation. No. 05-21-00196-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas June 10, 2022, no pet.).
  • In Smith v. State, another defendant was convicted of Class A misdemeanor unlawful restraint against his ex-fiancee after dragging her into her apartment and assaulting her. He grabbed her keys, refused to allow her to leave, and choked her. She was eventually able to leave, and went to the police station. The appellate court upheld the defendant’s convictions for assault and unlawful restraint. Smith v. State, No 02-21-00201-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth July 28, 2022, no pet.).
FAQs; Knowledge is power. Get honest answers now.

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating