Texas Penal Code 22.09 – Tampering With Consumer Product
WHAT IS TAMPERING WITH CONSUMER PRODUCT IN TEXAS?
The Texas law against tampering with a consumer product prohibits altering or adding a foreign substance to any food or drugs that will be sold or given to another person or the general public.
WHAT IS THE TAMPERING WITH CONSUMER PRODUCT LAW IN TEXAS?
Tex. Penal Code § 22.09. TAMPERING WITH CONSUMER PRODUCT.
(b) A person commits an offense if he knowingly or intentionally tampers with a consumer product knowing that the consumer product will be offered for sale to the public or as a gift to another.
(c) A person commits an offense if he knowingly or intentionally threatens to tamper with a consumer product with the intent to cause fear, to affect the sale of the consumer product, or to cause bodily injury to any person.
(d) An offense under Subsection (b) is a felony of the second degree unless a person suffers serious bodily injury, in which event it is a felony of the first degree. An offense under Subsection (c) is a felony of the third degree.
WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR TAMPERING WITH CONSUMER PRODUCT IN TEXAS?
The penalty category for tampering with a consumer product depends on the person’s intent, and resulting harm. Tampering with a consumer product is a:
- Third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison, if the person threatens to tamper with a consumer product with intent to:
- cause fear;
- affect the sale of the consumer product; or
- cause bodily injury to any person;
- Second degree felony, punishable by two to 20 years in prison, if:
- the person tampers with the product knowing it will be offered for sale to the public or as a gift to another;
- First degree felony, punishable by five to 99 years or life in prison, if:
- anyone suffers serious bodily injury as a result of the person’s product tampering.
WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR TAMPERING WITH CONSUMER PRODUCT IN TEXAS?
Threatening to tamper with a consumer product charged as a third degree felony carries a possible prison sentence between two and ten years. Tampering with a consumer product charged as a second degree felony carries between two to 20 years in prison. If tampering with a consumer product is charged as a first degree felony, the person faces a possible five to 99 years or life in prison. All felonies carry a maximum fine of $10,000.
WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR TAMPERING WITH CONSUMER PRODUCT IN TEXAS?
A person charged with tampering with a consumer product may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction, for a period not to exceed ten years.
WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO TAMPERING WITH CONSUMER PRODUCT IN TEXAS?
The statute does not provide for specific defenses to tampering with a consumer product. A person accused thereof may assert any defense in an attempt to negate at least one of the elements the State must prove at trial. For example, an accused may argue he or she lacked the requisite knowledge or intent to commit the crime.
WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR TAMPERING WITH CONSUMER PRODUCT IN TEXAS?
The limitation period for tampering with a consumer product is three years.
TAMPERING WITH CONSUMER PRODUCT IN TEXAS
Tampering with a consumer product aims to protect the public by ensuring the consumer’s safety. Even if no one is actually affected, the act of tampering by itself is a second degree felony, punishable by up to 20 years in prison. With this harsh punishment, the law seeks to discourage any conduct that would endanger the consumers who keep the economy alive.
TEXAS TAMPERING WITH CONSUMER PRODUCT COURT CASES
The case law regarding tampering with a consumer product in Texas gives examples of the statute’s application.
- In Nahidmobarekeh v. State, the defendant was convicted of tampering with a consumer product. Customers of a Dallas grocery store complained about a foul odor on fresh-baked breads and cookies in the store’s self-serve bakery section. A bakery employee saw the defendant throw brown powder on the baked goods. She told her supervisor.The defendant confessed that he took his feces, dried it in the sun, grated it into fine pieces, and sprinkled it on the store’s baked goods because the store’s employees were rude to him. At trial, an epidemiologist explained fecal matter was known to cause illness if ingested. Sufficient evidence supported probable serious bodily injury if customers were to consume the baked goods.
Glowing Client Reviews
Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!
I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.
Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.
I really appreciated all he did for me.
Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.
He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!
Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.
Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.
He saved my career. Forever grateful!
Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.
He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15
Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+
Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.
Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.
Contact Trey Porter Today
Request a free consultation
The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.
If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.