Texas Penal Code 31.16 – Organized Retail Theft

WHAT IS ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT IN TEXAS?

The Texas law against organized retail theft prohibits conduct that promotes or facilitates retail theft, including receiving, storing, and selling stolen retail merchandise.

Texas Penal Code 31.16 - Organized Retail Theft

WHAT IS THE ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 31.16. ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT.

(b) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally conducts, promotes, or facilitates an activity in which the person receives, possesses, conceals, stores, barters, sells, or disposes of:

(1) stolen retail merchandise; or

(2) merchandise explicitly represented to the person as being stolen retail merchandise.

(c) An offense under this section is:

(1) a Class C misdemeanor if the total value of the merchandise involved in the activity is less than $100;

(2) a Class B misdemeanor if the total value of the merchandise involved in the activity is $100 or more but less than $750;

(3) a Class A misdemeanor if the total value of the merchandise involved in the activity is $750 or more but less than $2,500;

(4) a state jail felony if the total value of the merchandise involved in the activity is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000;

(5) a felony of the third degree if the total value of the merchandise involved in the activity is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000;

(6) a felony of the second degree if the total value of the merchandise involved in the activity is $150,000 or more but less than $300,000; or

(7) a felony of the first degree if the total value of the merchandise involved in the activity is $300,000 or more.

(d) An offense described for purposes of punishment by Subsections (c)(1)-(6) is increased to the next higher category of offense if it is shown on the trial of the offense that:

(1) the person organized, supervised, financed, or managed one or more other persons engaged in an activity described by Subsection (b); or

(2) during the commission of the offense, a person engaged in an activity described by Subsection (b) intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly:

(A) caused a fire exit alarm to sound or otherwise become activated;

(B) deactivated or otherwise prevented a fire exit alarm or retail theft detector from sounding; or

(C) used a shielding or deactivation instrument to prevent or attempt to prevent detection of the offense by a retail theft detector.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT IN TEXAS?

The penalty classification for organized retail theft depends on the total value of the merchandise involved in the activity. Organized retail theft is a:

  • Class C misdemeanor, punishable by a maximum $500 fine, if:
    • the total value is less than $100;
  • Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in county jail, if:
    • the total value is $100 or more but less than $750;
  • Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail, if:
    • the total value is $750 or more but less than $2,500;
  • State jail felony, punishable by 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, if:
    • the total value is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000;
  • Third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison, if:
    • the total value is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000;
  • Second degree felony, punishable by two to 20 years in prison, if:
    • the total value is $150,000 or more but less than $300,000;
  • First degree felony, punishable by five to 99 years or life in prison, if:
    • the total value is over $300,000.

Texas law further enhances organized retail theft penalties based on the person’s conduct. Organized retail theft is enhanced to the next highest penalty classification if:

  • the person organized, supervised, financed, or managed the organized retail theft operation; or
  • during the commission of the theft, the person:
    • activated a fire exit alarm;
    • deactivated or otherwise prevented a fire exit alarm or retail theft detector from sounding; or
    • used or attempted to use an instrument to shield or deactivate a retail theft detector.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT IN TEXAS?

The punishment range for organized retail theft increases with the total value of the stolen retail merchandise:

  • Class C misdemeanor, if the value is less than $100:
    • maximum fine of $500, no jail time;
  • Class B misdemeanor, if the value is $100 or more but less than $750:
    • up to 180 days in jail, maximum fine of $2,000;
  • Class A misdemeanor, if the value is $750 or more but less than $2,500:
    • up to one year in jail, maximum fine of $4,000;
  • State jail felony, if the value is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000:
    • 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, maximum fine of $10,000;
  • Third degree felony, if the value is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000:
    • two to ten years in prison, maximum fine of $10,000;
  • Second degree felony, if the value is $150,000 or more but less than $300,000:
    • two to 20 years in prison, maximum fine of $10,000;
  • First degree felony, if the value is $300,000 or more:
    • five to 99 years or life in prison, maximum fine of $10,000.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT IN TEXAS?

A person convicted of organized retail theft may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction. The period of community supervision depends on the offense category.

There is no community supervision required after a Class C misdemeanor conviction, but a person charged with a Class C misdemeanor organized retail theft may be placed on deferred adjudication for up to 180 days.

The period of community supervision for Class A or Class B misdemeanors may not exceed two years. A judge may also order up to 30 days in jail as a condition of community supervision on misdemeanor cases.

The period of community supervision for a state jail felony organized retail theft is from two to five years, with the possibility of extending supervision for up to ten years.

For a third degree felony organized retail theft charge, a person may be placed on deferred adjudication for up to ten years, or probation for a period between two and five years.

The period of community supervision for first degree felony and second degree felony organized retail theft charges may not exceed ten years. A judge may also order up to 180 days in jail as a condition of community supervision on felony cases.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT IN TEXAS?

The statute does not authorize specific defenses to organized retail theft. A person accused thereof may attempt to negate one of the elements the State must prove at trial.

  • What are examples of organized retail theft? The Texas law against organized retail theft crimes targets professional crime rings involved in large-scale theft and transferring, repackaging, and reselling stolen retail merchandise. A conviction requires proof of some activity distinct from ordinary shoplifting by a single actor.In Young v. State, the defendant and four others would replace the universal product codes (“UPC”) on expensive items with inexpensive ones, then purchase the items for the lower price. The group would then return the products at a different Walmart store with the original, more expensive UPC code for a Walmart gift card.

    The defendant made 40 returns over nearly two years, and was convicted of organized retail theft. The appellate court affirmed, finding the defendant and others knowingly participated in an ongoing scheme involving large-scale retail theft.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for organized retail theft categorized as a felony is five years. Organized retail theft classified as a misdemeanor has a two-year limitation period.

ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT IN TEXAS

Texas organized retail crime is distinct from petty shoplifting in that it involves professional theft rings that move quickly from community to community and across county lines to steal large amounts of merchandise.

This criminal activity involves thieves, also known as “boosters,” organized by a central figure—a “fence”—that pays the boosters pennies on the dollar, then repackages and resells the merchandise through alternate distribution channels to the general public.

TEXAS ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT COURT CASES

The case law regarding organized retail theft in Texas explains the difference between ordinary theft and organized retail theft.

  • In Lang v. State, the defendant was caught shoplifting $565.59 worth of items from HEB, an isolated incident in which she was acting alone. She was indicted for and convicted of organized retail theft, but the Court of Criminal Appeals held the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction. The State failed to show she did anything more than commit theft.On remand, the appellate court entered a judgment of acquittal because the indictment did not allege the owner of the stolen property, but the CCA in Lang II again reversed, holding the defendant could be convicted of ordinary theft.
FAQs; Knowledge is power. Get honest answers now.

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating