Texas Penal Code 32.24 – Stealing or Receiving Stolen Check or Similar Sight Order
WHAT IS STEALING OR RECEIVING STOLEN CHECK OR SIMILAR SIGHT ORDER IN TEXAS?
The Texas law against stealing or receiving a stolen check or similar sight order prohibits taking another’s unsigned checks without consent, or knowingly accepting stolen checks bearing someone else’s name.
WHAT IS THE STEALING OR RECEIVING STOLEN CHECK OR SIMILAR SIGHT ORDER LAW IN TEXAS?
Tex. Penal Code § 32.24. STEALING OR RECEIVING STOLEN CHECK OR SIMILAR SIGHT ORDER.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person steals an unsigned check or similar sight order or, with knowledge that an unsigned check or similar sight order has been stolen, receives the check or sight order with intent to use it, to sell it, or to transfer it to a person other than the person from whom the check or sight order was stolen.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR STEALING OR RECEIVING STOLEN CHECK OR SIMILAR SIGHT ORDER IN TEXAS?
Stealing or receiving a stolen check or similar sight order is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail.
WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR STEALING OR RECEIVING STOLEN CHECK OR SIMILAR SIGHT ORDER IN TEXAS?
The punishment range for stealing or receiving a stolen check or similar sight order, a Class A misdemeanor, is up to one year in jail, and a maximum fine of $4,000.
WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR STEALING OR RECEIVING STOLEN CHECK OR SIMILAR SIGHT ORDER IN TEXAS?
A person charged with stealing or receiving a stolen check or similar sight order may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication for up to two years.
WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO STEALING OR RECEIVING STOLEN CHECK OR SIMILAR SIGHT ORDER IN TEXAS?
The statute does not authorize specific defenses to stealing or receiving a stolen check or similar sight order. A person accused thereof may assert any defense in an attempt to negate at least one of the elements the State must prove at trial. For example, an accused may argue he or she lacked the requisite knowledge or intent to commit the offense.
WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR STEALING OR RECEIVING STOLEN CHECK OR SIMILAR SIGHT ORDER IN TEXAS?
The limitation period for stealing or receiving a stolen check or similar sight order, a Class A misdemeanor, is two years.
STEALING OR RECEIVING STOLEN CHECK OR SIMILAR SIGHT ORDER IN TEXAS
It is a crime in Texas to take another’s unsigned checks or to receive unsigned checks with someone else’s name on them. The law punishes this conduct as a Class A misdemeanor, because it is often committed with the intent to commit further offenses with higher penalties, such as forgery.
Glowing Client Reviews
Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!
I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.
Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.
I really appreciated all he did for me.
Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.
He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!
Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.
Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.
He saved my career. Forever grateful!
Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.
He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15
Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+
Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DWI 2nd
Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.
Contact Trey Porter Today
Request a free consultation
The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.
If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.
