Texas Penal Code 32.32 – False Statement to Obtain Property or Credit or in the Provision of Certain Services

WHAT IS FALSE STATEMENT TO OBTAIN PROPERTY OR CREDIT OR IN THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN SERVICES IN TEXAS?

The law against making a false statement to obtain property or credit or in the provision of certain services prohibits making false or misleading statements in credit applications or property appraisal documents.

Texas Penal Code 32.32 - False Statement to Obtain Property or Credit or in the Provision of Certain Services

WHAT IS THE FALSE STATEMENT TO OBTAIN PROPERTY OR CREDIT OR IN THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN SERVICES LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 32.32. FALSE STATEMENT TO OBTAIN PROPERTY OR CREDIT OR IN THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN SERVICES.

(b) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly makes a materially false or misleading written statement to obtain property or credit, including a mortgage loan.

(b-1) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally or knowingly makes a materially false or misleading written statement in providing an appraisal of real property for compensation.

(c) An offense under this section is:

(1) a Class C misdemeanor if the value of the property or the amount of credit is less than $100;

(2) a Class B misdemeanor if the value of the property or the amount of credit is $100 or more but less than $750;

(3) a Class A misdemeanor if the value of the property or the amount of credit is $750 or more but less than $2,500;

(4) a state jail felony if the value of the property or the amount of credit is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000;

(5) a felony of the third degree if the value of the property or the amount of credit is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000;

(6) a felony of the second degree if the value of the property or the amount of credit is $150,000 or more but less than $300,000; or

(7) a felony of the first degree if the value of the property or the amount of credit is $300,000 or more.

. . .

(e) With the consent of the appropriate local county or district attorney, the attorney general has concurrent jurisdiction with that consenting local prosecutor to prosecute an offense under this section that involves a mortgage loan.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR FALSE STATEMENT TO OBTAIN PROPERTY OR CREDIT OR IN THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN SERVICES IN TEXAS?

The penalty category for making a false statement to obtain property or credit or in the provision of certain services depends on the value of the property or the amount of credit. If the value of the property or amount of credit obtained is:

  • Less than $100:
    • Class C misdemeanor, punishable by up to a $500 fine, and no jail time;
  • $100 to $749:
    • Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in county jail;
  • $750 to $2499:
    • Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail;
  • $2500 to $29,999:
    • State jail felony, punishable by 180 days to two years in a state jail facility;
  • $30,000 to $149,000:
    • Third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison;
  • $150,000 to $299,999:
    • Second degree felony, punishable by two to 20 years in prison;
  • $300,000 or more:
    • First degree felony, punishable by five to 99 years or life in prison.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR FALSE STATEMENT TO OBTAIN PROPERTY OR CREDIT OR IN THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN SERVICES IN TEXAS?

The punishment range for making a false statement to obtain property or credit or in the provision of certain services increases with the value of property or credit obtained through deception:

  • Class C misdemeanor, if the value is less than $100:
    • Maximum fine of $500, no jail time;
  • Class B misdemeanor, if the value is $100 or more but less than $750:
    • Up to 180 days in jail, maximum fine of $2,000;
  • Class A misdemeanor, if the value is $750 or more but less than $2,500:
    • Up to one year in jail, maximum fine of $4,000;
  • State jail felony, if the value is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000:
    • 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, maximum fine of $10,000;
  • Third degree felony, if the value is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000:
    • Two to ten years in prison, maximum fine of $10,000;
  • Second degree felony, if the value is $150,000 or more but less than $300,000:
    • Two to 20 years in prison, maximum fine of $10,000;
  • First degree felony, if the value is $300,000 or more:
    • Five to 99 years or life in prison, maximum fine of $10,000.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR FALSE STATEMENT TO OBTAIN PROPERTY OR CREDIT OR IN THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN SERVICES IN TEXAS?

A person charged with making a false statement to obtain property or credit or in the provision of certain services may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction.

  • What is the maximum length of probation for making a false statement to obtain property or credit or in the provision of certain services in Texas? If a person is convicted of a Class C misdemeanor, the only punishment is a maximum fine of $500. But a person may be placed on probation for up to two years if convicted of a Class A or Class B misdemeanor. For state jail and third degree felony false statement charges, the probation term may range from two to five years, and may not exceed ten years for second degree and first degree felonies.
  • What is the maximum length of deferred adjudication for making a false statement to obtain property or credit or in the provision of certain services in Texas? To avoid a false statement conviction, a person may plead guilty or nolo contendere (“no contest”) to a judge, and be placed on deferred adjudication. The period of deferred adjudication may not exceed 180 days for a Class C misdemeanor, or two years for a Class A or Class B misdemeanor. The deferred adjudication term for a state jail felony is between two and five years, with the possibility of extending it up to ten years. The deferred adjudication term may not exceed ten years for first degree, second degree, and third degree felonies.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO FALSE STATEMENT TO OBTAIN PROPERTY OR CREDIT OR IN THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN SERVICES IN TEXAS?

An accused on trial for making a false statement to obtain property or credit or in the provision of certain services most commonly attempts to negate one of the elements. The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the person intentionally or knowingly made a materially false or misleading statement to obtain property or credit.

  • What is “credit”? “Credit” is any loan of money or property, with the obligation to return or repay what was borrowed. It includes bank loans and credit or debit cards, mortgage loans, or lines of credit.

    In Briscoe v. State, a defendant involved in a property dispute sold farm equipment he did not own, including a Bobcat. The bill of sale gave the defendant the right to buy back the Bobcat within 90 days. The defendant was convicted of theft for selling another’s property, and for making a false statement to obtain credit, based on the Bobcat bill of sale. The appellate court reversed his false statement conviction, noting the evidence showed the defendant had a buyback option, rather than an obligation. This was a sale rather than a loan.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FALSE STATEMENT TO OBTAIN PROPERTY OR CREDIT OR IN THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN SERVICES IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for false statement to obtain property or credit or in the provision of certain services is seven years.

FALSE STATEMENT TO OBTAIN PROPERTY OR CREDIT OR IN THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN SERVICES IN TEXAS

Texas law prohibits making a materially false or misleading statement to obtain property, credit, or certain services. A statement is “materially” false or misleading if it affects the outcome—i.e., if the person obtained a greater amount of property or credit than they would have had they not made the statement.

TEXAS FALSE STATEMENT TO OBTAIN PROPERTY OR CREDIT OR IN THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN SERVICES COURT CASES

The case law regarding false statement to obtain property or credit or in the provision of certain services in Texas demonstrates every materially false statement constitutes a separate offense.

  • In Jones v. State, the defendant applied for a $680,000 mortgage loan, and a $544,000 mortgage loan. He misrepresented in each application that he had bank accounts he did not have, and submitted another’s credit report as his own. He was convicted of making a total of six false statements, and sentenced to 45 years in prison for each, due to the first-degree-felony amount of credit sought.

    The defendant argued on appeal he should have only been convicted of two charges, one for each application. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the six convictions, holding each materially false statement is a separate offense.

Resources & information

Frequently asked questions

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating