Texas Penal Code 38.09 – Implements for Escape

WHAT IS IMPLEMENTS FOR ESCAPE IN TEXAS?

The Texas law against implements for escape prohibits providing another who is custody anything that could be used to escape custody, including a deadly weapon.

Texas Penal Code 38.09 - Implements for Escape

WHAT IS THE IMPLEMENTS FOR ESCAPE LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 38.09. IMPLEMENTS FOR ESCAPE.

(a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to facilitate escape, he introduces into a correctional facility, or provides a person in custody or an inmate with, a deadly weapon or anything that may be useful for escape.

(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree unless the actor introduced or provided a deadly weapon, in which event the offense is a felony of the second degree.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR IMPLEMENTS FOR ESCAPE IN TEXAS?

Implements for escape is a third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison. Implements for escape is enhanced to a second degree felony, punishable by two to 20 years in prison, if the person provides another in custody with a deadly weapon to effect an escape.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR IMPLEMENTS FOR ESCAPE IN TEXAS?

A person charged with second degree felony implements for escape faces between two and 20 years in prison, and a maximum fine of $10,000. If the implements for escape is charged as a third degree felony, a person faces between two and ten years in prison, and up to a $10,000 fine.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR IMPLEMENTS FOR ESCAPE IN TEXAS?

A person charged with implements for escape may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction, for a period not to exceed ten years.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO IMPLEMENTS FOR ESCAPE IN TEXAS?

The statute does not authorize specific defenses to implements for escape. A person accused thereof may attempt to negate at least one of the elements the State must prove at trial.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTS FOR ESCAPE IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for implements for escape, charged as either a third degree or second degree felony, is three years.

IMPLEMENTS FOR ESCAPE IN TEXAS

It is a second degree felony to provide an inmate or anyone in custody with a deadly weapon, intending to aid in their escape from custody. Providing or “introducing” anything else into a correctional facility that could be used in an escape attempt is a third degree felony.

TEXAS IMPLEMENTS FOR ESCAPE COURT CASES

The case law regarding implements for escape in Texas gives examples of prohibited conduct.

  • In Jones v. State, the defendant brought a gun to visitation with her boyfriend, a prison inmate. Five days later, the boyfriend used the gun to hold a guard hostage in an attempt to escape. The plan was foiled, and he confessed the defendant supplied the gun for him, and he smuggled it past the guards at visitation. The defendant was convicted of introducing implements for escape into a correctional facility, and the appellate court affirmed.
FAQs; Knowledge is power. Get honest answers now.

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating