Texas Penal Code 38.16 – Preventing Execution of Civil Process
WHAT IS PREVENTING EXECUTION OF CIVIL PROCESS IN TEXAS?
The Texas law against preventing execution of civil process prohibits engaging in words or actions with the intent to inhibit civil process server’s execution of process in a civil cause.
WHAT IS THE PREVENTING EXECUTION OF CIVIL PROCESS LAW IN TEXAS?
Tex. Penal Code § 38.16. PREVENTING EXECUTION OF CIVIL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly by words or physical action prevents the execution of any process in a civil cause.
(b) It is an exception to the application of this section that the actor evaded service of process by avoiding detection.
(c) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR PREVENTING EXECUTION OF CIVIL PROCESS IN TEXAS?
Preventing execution of civil process is a Class C misdemeanor, punishable by up to a $500 fine.
WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR PREVENTING EXECUTION OF CIVIL PROCESS IN TEXAS?
The punishment range for preventing execution of civil process, a Class C misdemeanor, is up to a $500 fine, and no jail time.
WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR PREVENTING EXECUTION OF CIVIL PROCESS IN TEXAS?
A person charged with preventing execution of civil process may be placed on deferred adjudication for up to 180 days. The judge who defers further proceedings without finding the person guilty may require conditions of deferred adjudication, such as community service, counseling, or payment of any restitution.
WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO PREVENTING EXECUTION OF CIVIL PROCESS IN TEXAS?
The statute provides an exception to the offense for a person who evades service or avoids detection. This means that if a person hides from a process server rather than interacting—for example, by turning off all the lights and not answering the door—he may not be punished for preventing execution of civil process.
WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR PREVENTING EXECUTION OF CIVIL PROCESS IN TEXAS?
The limitation period for preventing execution of civil process, a Class C misdemeanor, is two years.
PREVENTING EXECUTION OF CIVIL PROCESS IN TEXAS
Preventing the execution of civil process requires intentionally or knowingly inhibiting a process server’s attempts to execute service of process. The person must have actively engaged in conduct, through words or physical actions, that prevented service of process, rather than simply hiding or avoiding detection.
TEXAS PREVENTING EXECUTION OF CIVIL PROCESS COURT CASES
There is no case law regarding preventing execution of civil process in Texas. The only authority to shed light on the statute’s application is the Office of the Attorney General of Texas.
- The Office of the Attorney General issued an opinion on this law in 2003, advising that private businesses may refuse entry to process servers and sheriffs, without being prosecuted under Section 38.16. In such a scenario, a process server may request authorization from a court to leave the citation at the location with anyone over 16 years of age.
Glowing Client Reviews
Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!
I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.
Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.
I really appreciated all he did for me.
Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.
He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!
Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.
Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.
He saved my career. Forever grateful!
Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.
He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15
Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+
Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DWI 2nd
Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.
Contact Trey Porter Today
Request a free consultation
The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.
If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.
