Texas Penal Code 39.04 – Violations of the Civil Rights of Person in Custody; Improper Sexual Activity with Person in Custody

WHAT IS VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSON IN CUSTODY; IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY OR UNDER SUPERVISION IN TEXAS?

Texas law prohibits anyone employed by or volunteering in a correctional facility or juvenile facility from violating a person’s civil rights while in custody, or engaging in sexual conduct with a person in custody or under supervision.

Texas Penal Code 39.04 - Violations of the Civil Rights of Person in Custody; Improper Sexual Activity with Person in Custody

WHAT IS THE VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSON IN CUSTODY; IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY OR UNDER SUPERVISION LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 39.04. VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSON IN CUSTODY; IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY OR UNDER SUPERVISION.

(a) An official of a correctional facility or juvenile facility, an employee of a correctional facility or juvenile facility, a person other than an employee who works for compensation at a correctional facility or juvenile facility, a volunteer at a correctional facility or juvenile facility, or a peace officer commits an offense if the person intentionally:

(1) denies or impedes a person in custody in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, or immunity knowing his conduct is unlawful; or

(2) engages in sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or deviate sexual intercourse with an individual in custody or, in the case of an individual in the custody of the Texas Juvenile Justice Department or placed in a juvenile facility, employs, authorizes, or induces the individual to engage in sexual conduct or a sexual performance.

<Text of (b), as amended by Acts 2021, 87th Leg., ch. 895 (H.B. 3157), § 1>

(b) An offense under Subsection (a)(1) is a felony of the third degree . An offense under Subsection (a)(2) is a felony of the second degree, except that an offense under Subsection (a)(2) is a felony of the first degree if the offense is committed against:

(1) an individual in the custody of the Texas Juvenile Justice Department or placed in a juvenile facility; or

(2) a juvenile offender detained in or committed to a correctional facility.

<Text of (b), as amended by Acts 2021, 87th Leg., ch. 939 (S.B. 312), § 1>

(b) An offense under Subsection (a)(1) is a Class A misdemeanor. An offense under Subsection (a)(2) is a felony of the second degree .

(c) This section shall not preclude prosecution for any other offense set out in this code.

(d) The Attorney General of Texas shall have concurrent jurisdiction with law enforcement agencies to investigate violations of this statute involving serious bodily injury or death.

. . .

(f) An employee of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the Texas Juvenile Justice Department, a juvenile facility, a local juvenile probation department, or a community supervision and corrections department established under Chapter 76, Government Code, a person other than an employee who works for compensation at a juvenile facility or local juvenile probation department, or a volunteer at a juvenile facility or local juvenile probation department commits an offense if the actor engages in sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or deviate sexual intercourse with an individual who the actor knows is under the supervision of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Juvenile Justice Department, probation department, or community supervision and corrections department but not in the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Juvenile Justice Department, probation department, or community supervision and corrections department.

(g) An offense under Subsection (f) is a state jail felony.

(h) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under Subsection (f) that the actor was the spouse of the individual at the time of the offense.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSON IN CUSTODY; IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY OR UNDER SUPERVISION IN TEXAS?

The House and Senate enacted conflicting laws enhancing the penalty classification for this offense. Because HB 3157 was enacted one day after SB 312, HB 3157 would prevail. The penalty classifications further depend on the severity of the conduct of the person working or volunteering at a correctional facility or juvenile facility.

  • First degree felony, punishable by five to 99 years or life in prison (or second degree felony under SB 312):
    • If the person employs, authorizes, or induces a juvenile inmate to engage in sexual conduct or sexual performance.
  • Second degree felony, punishable by two to 20 years in prison (under both bills):
    • If the person engages in sexual contact, intercourse, or deviate sexual intercourse with an inmate;
  • Third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison (or Class A misdemeanor under SB 312, punishable by up to one year in jail):
    • If the person knowingly denies or impedes an inmate’s exercise or enjoyment of a right, privilege, or immunity;
  • State jail felony, punishable by 180 days to two years in a state jail facility (under both bills):
    • If a person employed by a correctional facility, juvenile facility, or the probation department engages in sexual contact, intercourse, or deviate sexual intercourse with a person on probation, deferred, or parole.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSON IN CUSTODY; IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY OR UNDER SUPERVISION IN TEXAS?

The punishment range for violating the civil rights of a person in custody, or improper sexual activity with a person in custody, depends on the penalty classification:

  • Class A misdemeanor: possible jail sentence of up to one year, maximum fine of $4,000;
    • Senate Bill 312 makes denying or impeding an inmate’s rights, privileges, and immunities a Class A misdemeanor, but HB makes it a third degree felony.
  • State jail felony: 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, maximum fine of $10,000;
    • If a correctional or juvenile facility employee or volunteer, or a supervision officer, engages in sexual activity with a person on probation, deferred adjudication, or parole, it is punishable as a state jail felony.
  • Third degree felony: two to ten years in prison, maximum fine of $10,000;
    • HB 3157 makes denying or impeding an inmate’s rights, privileges, or immunities a third degree felony, and pursuant to statutory construction rules in Texas Government Code 311.025(b), HB 3157 controls, rather than SB 312.
  • Second degree felony: two to 20 years in prison, maximum fine of $10,000;
    • Both bills punish engaging in sexual activity with a person in custody as a second degree felony. SB 312, the irreconcilable, non-controlling amendment, also punishes employing or authorizing sexual conduct or performance of a juvenile in custody, which HB 3157 punishes as a first degree felony.
  • First degree felony: five to 99 years or life in prison, maximum fine of $10,000;
    • HB 3157 makes it a first degree felony for an employee or volunteer at a correctional or juvenile facility to employ, authorize, or induce a juvenile inmate to engage in sexual conduct or sexual performance.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSON IN CUSTODY; IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY OR UNDER SUPERVISION IN TEXAS?

A person charged with violating civil rights of a person in custody, or improper sexual activity with a person in custody may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction. The minimum and maximum periods of supervision are:

  • Class A misdemeanor: maximum period of two years;
  • State jail felony: between two and five years, with the possibility of extending supervision for up to ten years;
  • Third degree and second degree felonies: between two and ten years;
  • First degree felony: between five and ten years.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSON IN CUSTODY; IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY OR UNDER SUPERVISION IN TEXAS?

If a supervision officer or correctional facility employee or volunteer engages in sexual activity with anyone on probation, deferred adjudication, or parole, the statute authorizes an affirmative defense if they were spouses.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSON IN CUSTODY; IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY OR UNDER SUPERVISION IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for violation of the civil rights of a person in custody categorized as a felony is three years. If the offense is a Class A misdemeanor, the limitation period is two years.

VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSON IN CUSTODY; IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY OR UNDER SUPERVISION IN TEXAS

Persons working or volunteering in a correctional facility or juvenile facility may not engage in sexual conduct with anyone who is in custody or under supervision, nor may employees or volunteers deny inmates or detainees any right, privilege, or immunity.

TEXAS VIOLATION OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSON IN CUSTODY; IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY OR UNDER SUPERVISION COURT CASES

The case law regarding violation of the civil rights of a person in custody, or improper sexual activity with a person in custody or under supervision in Texas illustrates the statute’s application.

  • In Irielle v. State, the defendant was a prison guard, and the victim was an inmate. The defendant began going to the victim’s cubicle at night and masturbating in front of the victim. He later forced the victim to perform oral sex, and threatened to tell other prisoners the victim was convicted of sexually assaulting a child. The victim eventually told another guard about the defendant’s conduct, and the defendant was convicted of improper sexual activity. The appellate court affirmed.
FAQs; Knowledge is power. Get honest answers now.

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating