Texas Penal Code 43.24 – Sale, Distribution, or Display of Harmful Material to Minor
WHAT IS SALE, DISTRIBUTION, OR DISPLAY OF HARMFUL MATERIAL TO MINOR IN TEXAS?
Texas criminalizes selling, distributing, or recklessly displaying “harmful material” to a child under 18 years of age. A person also violates this law by hiring or using a minor to sell, distribute, or display harmful material to other minors.
- What is “harmful material”? Texas law deems material “harmful” if its dominant theme, as a whole: (1) appeals to the prurient interest of a minor, in sex, nudity, or excretion; (2) is patently offensive to the prevailing community standards with respect to what is suitable for minors; and (3) is utterly without redeeming social value for minors. Pornography, even though it is not considered obscene when made accessible to adults, can be considered “harmful material” if distributed to children.
WHAT IS THE SALE, DISTRIBUTION, OR DISPLAY OF HARMFUL MATERIAL TO MINOR LAW IN TEXAS?
Tex. Penal Code § 43.24. SALE, DISTRIBUTION, OR DISPLAY OF HARMFUL MATERIAL TO MINOR.
(b) A person commits an offense if, knowing that the material is harmful:
(1) and knowing the person is a minor, he sells, distributes, exhibits, or possesses for sale, distribution, or exhibition to a minor harmful material;
(2) he displays harmful material and is reckless about whether a minor is present who will be offended or alarmed by the display; or
(3) he hires, employs, or uses a minor to do or accomplish or assist in doing or accomplishing any of the acts prohibited in Subsection (b)(1) or (b)(2).
(c) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the sale, distribution, or exhibition was by a person having scientific, educational, governmental, or other similar justification.
(c-1) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor was the spouse of the minor at the time of the offense.
(d) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor unless it is committed under Subsection (b)(3) in which event it is a felony of the third degree.
WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR SALE, DISTRIBUTION, OR DISPLAY OF HARMFUL MATERIAL TO MINOR IN TEXAS?
Sale, distribution, or display of harmful material to a minor is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail. If, however, a person uses a minor to commit the offense, it is a third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison.
WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR SALE, DISTRIBUTION, OR DISPLAY OF HARMFUL MATERIAL TO MINOR IN TEXAS?
The punishment range for the Class A misdemeanor offense of selling, distributing, or displaying harmful material to a minor is a maximum possible jail sentence of one year, and up to a $4,000 fine. If charged as a third degree felony, it carries between two and ten years in prison, and a maximum fine of $10,000.
WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR SALE, DISTRIBUTION, OR DISPLAY OF HARMFUL MATERIAL TO MINOR IN TEXAS?
A person charged with sale, distribution, or display of harmful material to a minor may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction. The maximum period of community supervision for a Class A misdemeanor is two years, and ten years for a third degree felony.
WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO SALE, DISTRIBUTION, OR DISPLAY OF HARMFUL MATERIAL TO MINOR IN TEXAS?
The statute authorizes two defenses. The first is an affirmative defense available if the accused shows the sale, distribution, or exhibition was for scientific, educational, governmental, or other similar justification. For example, a health and sexual education teacher must be permitted to show minor students explicit photographs for educational purposes. The second statutory defense is available if the accused was married to the minor at the time of the offense.
- What if the accused did not know a minor saw the “harmful material”? The statute only requires the State to prove a person was reckless about whether a minor was present who will be offended or alarmed by the harmful material displayed. Even if a person does not know a child saw the visual material, if they displayed it somewhere in a reckless manner, that is sufficient to sustain a conviction.In Barton v. State, a defendant was charged for displaying harmful material to a minor after viewing porn on a library computer while children were nearby. The children saw the pornographic videos playing on the computer the defendant was using. The defendant testified he did not notice the children, but knew children were present at the library. The appellate court affirmed his conviction, holding the statute only requires a person to be reckless about whether a minor is present, and does not actually require a minor to be present or see the material.
WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR SALE, DISTRIBUTION, OR DISPLAY OF HARMFUL MATERIAL TO MINOR IN TEXAS?
The limitation period for sale, distribution, or display of harmful material to a minor categorized as a Class A misdemeanor is two years. If the offense constitutes a third degree felony, the limitation period is three years.
SALE, DISTRIBUTION, OR DISPLAY OF HARMFUL MATERIAL TO MINOR IN TEXAS
Sale, distribution, or display of harmful material to a minor prohibits showing or disseminating sexually explicit, patently offensive visual representations or literature to anyone under 18 years of age.
TEXAS SALE, DISTRIBUTION, OR DISPLAY OF HARMFUL MATERIAL TO A MINOR COURT CASES
The case law regarding sale, distribution, or display of harmful material to a minor in Texas speaks to the statute’s constitutional validity.
- In State v. Stone, a special agent posed as a 13-year-old girl while chatting online with the defendant, who sent three sexually explicit photos of himself exposing his genitals. Police compiled enough probable cause to execute a search of his home and computer, and found child pornography. The search warrant affidavit was based on the belief the defendant committed attempted display of harmful material to a minor, because the police knew the special agent was not actually a minor. The appellate court determined Section 43.24 is a constitutionally permissible variable of obscenity laws.
Glowing Client Reviews
Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!
I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.
Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.
I really appreciated all he did for me.
Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.
He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!
Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.
Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.
He saved my career. Forever grateful!
Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.
He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15
Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+
Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DWI 2nd
Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.
Contact Trey Porter Today
Request a free consultation
The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.
If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.