Texas Penal Code 43.261 – Electronic Transmission of Certain Visual Material Depicting Minor

WHAT IS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CERTAIN VISUAL MATERIAL DEPICTING MINOR IN TEXAS?

The Texas law against electronic transmitting certain visual material depicting a minor prohibits a person under 18 from creating, possessing, selling, providing, delivering, transferring, publishing, disseminating, exhibiting, or circulating by electronic means any film, photograph, videotape, or reproduction thereof of a minor engaging in sexual conduct.

  • Is it a crime in Texas for minors to text naked photos or videos of themselves? Yes. Texas Penal Code Section 43.261 punishes anyone under 18 years old for creating or distributing photos and videos of minors under 18 engaging in sexual conduct, including themselves.

WHAT IS THE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CERTAIN VISUAL MATERIAL DEPICTING MINOR LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 43.261. ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CERTAIN VISUAL MATERIAL DEPICTING MINOR.

(b) A person who is a minor commits an offense if the person intentionally or knowingly:

(1) by electronic means promotes to another minor visual material depicting a minor, including the actor, engaging in sexual conduct, if the actor produced the visual material or knows that another minor produced the visual material; or

(2) possesses in an electronic format visual material depicting another minor engaging in sexual conduct, if the actor produced the visual material or knows that another minor produced the visual material.

(c) An offense under Subsection (b)(1) is a Class C misdemeanor, except that the offense is:

(1) a Class B misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the actor:

(A) promoted the visual material with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, embarrass, or offend another; or

(B) except as provided by Subdivision (2)(A), has previously been convicted one time of any offense under this section; or

(2) a Class A misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the actor has previously been:

(A) convicted one or more times of an offense punishable under Subdivision (1)(A); or

(B) convicted two or more times of any offense under this section.

(d) An offense under Subsection (b)(2) is a Class C misdemeanor, except that the offense is:

(1) a Class B misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the actor has previously been convicted one time of any offense under this section; or

(2) a Class A misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the actor has previously been convicted two or more times of any offense under this section.

(e) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the visual material:

(1) depicted only the actor or another minor:

(A) who is not more than two years older or younger than the actor and with whom the actor had a dating relationship at the time of the offense; or

(B) who was the spouse of the actor at the time of the offense; and

(2) was promoted or received only to or from the actor and the other minor.

(f) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (b)(2) that the actor:

(1) did not produce or solicit the visual material;

(2) possessed the visual material only after receiving the material from another minor; and

(3) destroyed the visual material within a reasonable amount of time after receiving the material from another minor.

(g) If conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under another law, the defendant may be prosecuted under this section, the other law, or both.

(h) Notwithstanding Section 51.13, Family Code, a finding that a person has engaged in conduct in violation of this section is considered a conviction for the purposes of Subsections (c) and (d).

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CERTAIN VISUAL MATERIAL DEPICTING MINOR IN TEXAS?

The penalty classification for electronically transmitting certain visual material depicting a minor depends on the accused minor’s conduct, and whether the person has prior convictions for electronic transmission of certain visual material depicting a minor.

  • Class C misdemeanor, punishable by a maximum $500 fine, if the accused minor:
    • promoted visual material to another minor that shows a minor engaging in sexual conduct, if the accused or another minor produced the material; or
    • possessed electronic visual material that shows another minor engaging in sexual conduct, if the accused or another minor produced the material;
  • Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in county jail, if the accused minor:
    • promoted visual material to another minor that shows a minor engaging in sexual conduct, and:
      • did so with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, embarrass, or offend another; or
      • has one prior conviction for electronic visual material depicting a minor;
    • possessed electronic visual material that shows another minor engaging in sexual conduct, and has one prior conviction for electronic visual material depicting a minor;
  • Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail, if the accused minor:
    • promoted visual material to another minor that shows a minor engaging in sexual conduct, and has:
      • one prior conviction for a Class B misdemeanor electronic transmission of certain visual material depicting a minor with the intent to harass, torment, or embarrass another; or
      • at least two prior convictions for electronic transmission of certain visual material depicting a minor;
    • possessed electronic visual material that shows another minor engaging in sexual conduct, and has two or more prior convictions for electronic transmission of certain visual material depicting a minor.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CERTAIN VISUAL MATERIAL DEPICTING MINOR IN TEXAS?

The punishment range for electronic transmission of certain visual material depicting a minor corresponds to the penalty classification, which is categorized based on the person’s conduct, and whether the person has prior convictions.

  • Class A misdemeanor: up to one year in jail, maximum $4,000 fine;
  • Class B misdemeanor: up to 180 days in jail, maximum $2,000 fine;
  • Class C misdemeanor: maximum $500 fine.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CERTAIN VISUAL MATERIAL DEPICTING MINOR IN TEXAS?

A person charged with Class A or Class B misdemeanor electronic transmission of certain visual material depicting a minor may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction, for a period not to exceed two years.

A person charged with electronic transmission of certain visual material depicting a minor as a Class C misdemeanor may be placed on deferred adjudication for up to 180 days. A conviction will result in no jail time, a required fine not to exceed $500, and no community supervision term.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CERTAIN VISUAL MATERIAL DEPICTING MINOR IN TEXAS?

A minor accused of possessing prohibited visual material in an electronic format may assert a defense if the accused: (1) did not produce or solicit the visual material; (2) received the material from another minor; and (3) destroyed it within a reasonable amount of time after receiving it from another minor.

  • Can minors legally send sexually explicit photos and videos to each other in Texas? Yes, if they are dating or married, in addition to other circumstances. The Texas law prohibiting electronic transmission of certain visual material depicting a minor authorizes an affirmative defense if: (1) the visual material showed only the accused or the accused’s spouse or significant other; (2) the accused and the depicted minor or person with whom the visual material was shared were within two years of each other’s age; and (3) the visual material was shared only between the accused and other minor.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CERTAIN VISUAL MATERIAL DEPICTING MINOR IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for electronic transmission of certain visual material depicting a minor is two years.

ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CERTAIN VISUAL MATERIAL DEPICTING MINOR IN TEXAS

Texas law criminalizes minors sending electronic visual material showing themselves or other minors engaging in sexual conduct. The law also prohibits creating or otherwise contributing to manufacturing visual material depicting a minor engaging in sexual conduct.

FAQs; Knowledge is power. Get honest answers now.

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating