Texas Penal Code 32.23 – Trademark Counterfeiting

WHAT IS TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING IN TEXAS?

In Texas, a person commits trademark counterfeiting by manufacturing, selling, or advertising the sale of goods or services bearing a unique symbol identifying the good or service as authentic, when in fact it is not.

Texas Penal Code 32.23 - Trademark Counterfeiting

WHAT IS THE TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 32.23. TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING.

(b) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally manufactures, displays, advertises, distributes, offers for sale, sells, or possesses with intent to sell or distribute a counterfeit mark or an item or service that:

(1) bears or is identified by a counterfeit mark; or

(2) the person knows or should have known bears or is identified by a counterfeit mark.

(c) A state or federal certificate of registration of intellectual property is prima facie evidence of the facts stated in the certificate.

(d) For the purposes of Subsection (e), when items or services are the subject of counterfeiting in violation of this section pursuant to one scheme or continuing course of conduct, the conduct may be considered as one offense and the retail value of the items or services aggregated in determining the grade of offense.

(e) An offense under this section is a:

(1) Class C misdemeanor if the retail value of the item or service is less than $100;

(2) Class B misdemeanor if the retail value of the item or service is $100 or more but less than $750;

(3) Class A misdemeanor if the retail value of the item or service is $750 or more but less than $2,500;

(4) state jail felony if the retail value of the item or service is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000;

(5) felony of the third degree if the retail value of the item or service is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000;

(6) felony of the second degree if the retail value of the item or service is $150,000 or more but less than $300,000; or

(7) felony of the first degree if the retail value of the item or service is $300,000 or more.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING IN TEXAS?

The penalty classification for trademark counterfeiting depends on the retail value of the item or service. If the value is:

  • Less than $100:
    • Class C misdemeanor, punishable by up to a $500 fine, and no jail time;
  • $100 to $749:
    • Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in county jail;
  • $750 to $2499:
    • Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail;
  • $2500 to $29,999:
    • State jail felony, punishable by 180 days to two years in a state jail facility;
  • $30,000 to $149,000:
    • Third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison;
  • $150,000 to $299,999:
    • Second degree felony, punishable by two to 20 years in prison;
  • $300,000 or more:
    • First degree felony, punishable by five to 99 years or life in prison.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING IN TEXAS?

The punishment range for trademark counterfeiting increases with the retail value of the item or service:

  • Class C misdemeanor, if the retail value is less than $100:
    • maximum fine of $5,000, no jail time;
  • Class B misdemeanor, if the retail value is $100 or more but less than $750:
    • up to 180 days in jail, maximum fine of $2,000;
  • Class A misdemeanor, if the retail value is $750 or more but less than $2,500:
    • up to one year in jail, maximum fine of $4,000;
  • State jail felony, if the retail value is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000:
    • 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, maximum fine of $10,000;
  • Third degree felony, if the retail value is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000:
    • two to ten years in prison, maximum fine of $10,000;
  • Second degree felony, if the retail value is $150,000 or more but less than $300,000:
    • two to 20 years in prison, maximum fine of $10,000;
  • First degree felony, if the retail value is $300,000 or more:
    • five to 99 years or life in prison, maximum fine of $10,000.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING IN TEXAS?

A person charged with trademark counterfeiting may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction.

  • What is the length of probation for trademark counterfeiting? If a person is convicted of a Class C misdemeanor, the only punishment is a maximum fine of $500. But a person may be placed on probation for up to two years if convicted of a Class A or Class B misdemeanor. For state jail and third degree felony trademark counterfeiting charges, the probation term may range from two to five years, and may not exceed ten years for second degree and first degree felonies.
  • What is the length of deferred adjudication for trademark counterfeiting? To avoid a trademark counterfeiting conviction, a person may plead guilty or nolo contendere (“no contest”) to a judge, and be placed on deferred adjudication. The period of deferred adjudication may not exceed 180 days for a Class C misdemeanor, or two years for a Class A or Class B misdemeanor. The deferred adjudication term for a state jail felony is between two and five years, with the possibility of extending it up to ten years. The deferred adjudication term may not exceed ten years for first degree, second degree, and third degree felonies.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING IN TEXAS?

The statute does not authorize specific defenses to trademark counterfeiting. A person accused thereof may assert any defense in an attempt to negate at least one of the elements the State must prove at trial. For example, an accused may argue he or she lacked the requisite knowledge or intent to commit the offense.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for trademark counterfeiting classified as a misdemeanor is two years. If categorized as a felony, trademark counterfeiting has a three-year limitation period.

TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING IN TEXAS

Trademark counterfeiting is illegally manufacturing, advertising, or selling goods or services bearing a forged symbol of authenticity, when the product is not as represented–i.e., a knock-off.

TEXAS TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING COURT CASES

The case law regarding trademark counterfeiting in Texas demonstrates how courts analyze the circumstantial evidence showing a person’s intent to commit the offense.

In Nazemi v. State, the defendant and his wife sold jewelry in their retail shop. Undercover officers purchased jewelry with counterfeit Disney charms, Warner Bros. characters, and the Nike “swoosh” symbol, all of which were trademarked. The defendant denied knowledge of the counterfeit goods, but was convicted. The appellate court affirmed, noting that the defendant was knowledgeable and sophisticated in retail matters, owned other businesses, and had a bachelor’s degree in physics. Under the circumstances, the jury could have reasonably concluded the defendant knew the trademarked symbols were counterfeit. 28 S.W.3d 806 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg 2000, no pet.).

FAQs; Knowledge is power. Get honest answers now.

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating