Texas Penal Code 21.07 – Public Lewdness

WHAT IS PUBLIC LEWDNESS IN TEXAS?

The public lewdness statute outlaws sexual acts in public, or in a private place where it is likely that another will be present and see the sexual conduct. Texas law generally does not regulate consensual sex between adults, as long as it is done in private. 

Texas Penal Code 21.07 - Public Lewdness

WHAT IS THE PUBLIC LEWDNESS LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 21.07. PUBLIC LEWDNESS.

(a) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly engages in any of the following acts in a public place or, if not in a public place, the person is reckless about whether another is present who will be offended or alarmed by the person’s:

(1) act of sexual intercourse;

(2) act of deviate sexual intercourse; or

(3) act of sexual contact.

(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR PUBLIC LEWDNESS IN TEXAS?

Public lewdness is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR PUBLIC LEWDNESS IN TEXAS?

The punishment range for public lewdness, a Class A misdemeanor, is up to one year in jail, and up to a $4,000 fine. 

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR PUBLIC LEWDNESS IN TEXAS?

As an alternative to jail time, a person accused of public lewdness is eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication after a plea of nolo contendere (“no contest”) or guilty to a judge. The maximum period of either type of community supervision is two years.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO PUBLIC LEWDNESS IN TEXAS?

The most common defense is to argue the location of the offense was not a public place.

  • What is the Texas legal definition of “public place”? Texas law defines a “public place” as any place to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access. Public places include, but are not limited to, streets, highways, and the common areas of schools, hospitals, apartment houses, office buildings, transport facilities, and shops. In public lewdness cases, courts have upheld several locations as “public,” including parking lots, dressing rooms, communal showers in gym locker rooms, and adjoining booths in theaters.
  • Can you be charged with Public Lewdness in private? A person may still be charged with public lewdness, even if the sexual conduct is in a private location, as long as it is shown that the person was “reckless about whether another [was] present who [would] be offended or alarmed” by the sexual acts. Even if the person doesn’t know anyone else can see them, if they were reckless about their sexual conduct, this nonetheless constitutes public lewdness.In Smith v. State, a defendant called his 14-year-old neighbor and told her to look out the window. The defendant’s bedroom window was within view. She did not see anything, but told her parents about the call. Her father walked to the defendant’s home, where he saw the defendant and his wife engaging in fellatio directly in front of the window. The defendant was convicted of public lewdness. The appellate court affirmed, finding that he was reckless about whether another was present who would be alarmed by his behavior. 200 S.W.3d 644 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, pet. ref’d).

    In Hines v. State, a defendant took his friend’s 13-year-old daughter to a secluded area on his friend’s land and touched her inappropriately. The appellate court reversed the defendant’s conviction for public lewdness, holding that the defendant was not reckless about whether another person was present who would be alarmed or offended. He should have been prosecuted for indecency with a child, which has no “public place” or third-party presence requirement. Hines v. State, 906 S.W.2d 518 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR PUBLIC LEWDNESS IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for public lewdness, a Class A misdemeanor, is two years.

PUBLIC LEWDNESS IN TEXAS

Public lewdness is designed to protect members of the public from being offended or alarmed by what someone is doing. While other laws regulate non-consensual sexual conduct, whether in public or private, the public lewdness statute requires a third party presence in order to constitute an offense.

TEXAS PUBLIC LEWDNESS COURT CASES

The case law in Texas regarding public lewdness shows that the most commonly appealed issue in public lewdness cases is the “public place” element, as discussed above. The other elements of the offense, such as the “intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire” of another, have also been analyzed.

The specific intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of a person can be inferred from conduct, remarks, or all the surrounding circumstances, including conduct occurring after the incident. 

  • In Perales v. State, the defendant touched the victim’s vagina over her clothes in a bar full of people, which may now also be charged as indecent assault. He moved his fingertips in an upward motion while smirking and laughing. The court affirmed the conviction. Based on the defendant’s actions, he intended to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any other person, whether it be himself, the victim, or other person in the bar. No. 03-13-005110CR (Tex. App—Austin Oct. 10, 2014, pet. ref’d).

Resources & information

Frequently asked questions

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating