Texas Penal Code 32.315 – Fraudulent Use or Possession of Credit Card or Debit Card Information

WHAT IS FRAUDULENT USE OR POSSESSION OF CREDIT CARD OR DEBIT CARD INFORMATION IN TEXAS?

The law against fraudulent use or possession of credit card or debit card information penalizes a person who uses or is in possession of another’s credit or debit card information without permission, a counterfeit credit card, or data stored on the card’s “digital imprint.”

Texas Penal Code 32.315 - Fraudulent Use or Possession of Credit Card or Debit Card Information

WHAT IS THE FRAUDULENT USE OR POSSESSION OF CREDIT CARD OR DEBIT CARD INFORMATION LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 32.315. FRAUDULENT USE OR POSSESSION OF CREDIT CARD OR DEBIT CARD INFORMATION.

(b) A person commits an offense if the person, with the intent to harm or defraud another, obtains, possesses, transfers, or uses:

(1) a counterfeit credit card or debit card;

(2) the number and expiration date of a credit card or debit card without the consent of the account holder; or

(3) the data stored on the digital imprint of a credit card or debit card without the consent of the account holder.

(c) If an actor possessed five or more of an item described by Subsection (b)(2) or (3), a rebuttable presumption exists that the actor possessed each item without the consent of the account holder.

(d) The presumption established under Subsection (c) does not apply to a business or other commercial entity or a government agency that is engaged in a business activity or governmental function that does not violate a penal law of this state.

(e) An offense under this section is:

(1) a state jail felony if the number of items obtained, possessed, transferred, or used is less than five;

(2) a felony of the third degree if the number of items obtained, possessed, transferred, or used is five or more but less than 10;

(3) a felony of the second degree if the number of items obtained, possessed, transferred, or used is 10 or more but less than 50; or

(4) a felony of the first degree if the number of items obtained, possessed, transferred, or used is 50 or more.

(f) If a court orders a defendant convicted of an offense under this section to make restitution to a victim of the offense, the court may order the defendant to reimburse the victim for lost income or other expenses, other than attorney’s fees, incurred as a result of the offense.

(g) If conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under any other law, the actor may be prosecuted under this section, the other law, or both.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR FRAUDULENT USE OR POSSESSION OF CREDIT CARD OR DEBIT CARD INFORMATION IN TEXAS?

The penalty category for fraudulent use or possession of credit card or debit card information depends on the number of cards, card information, or digital imprints a person possesses. If a person has:

  • one to four items:
    • state jail felony, punishable by 180 days to two years in a state jail facility;
  • five to nine items:
    • third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison;
  • ten to 49 items:
    • second degree felony, punishable by two to 20 years in prison;
  • 50 or more items:
    • first degree felony, punishable by five to 99 years or life in prison.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR FRAUDULENT USE OR POSSESSION OF CREDIT CARD OR DEBIT CARD INFORMATION IN TEXAS?

The punishment range for fraudulent use or possession of credit card or debit card information charged as a first degree felony is five to 99 years or life in prison. The maximum fine for all felony charges is $10,000. For a second degree felony, the prison sentence may range from two to 20 years, and a third degree felony carries between two to ten years in prison. Fraudulent use or possession of credit card or debit card information charged as a state jail felony carries between 180 days and two years in a state jail facility.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR FRAUDULENT USE OR POSSESSION OF CREDIT CARD OR DEBIT CARD INFORMATION IN TEXAS?

A person charged with fraudulent use or possession of credit card or debit card information may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction.

  • What is the length of probation for fraudulent use or possession of credit card or debit card information in Texas? A person is eligible for probation from a jury after being found guilty only if he or she has no prior felony convictions, and is sentenced to less than ten years in prison. A person who pleads guilty or nolo contendere (“no contest”) to a judge may be placed on probation at the judge’s discretion.

    For state jail and third degree felony fraud convictions, the period of probation may range between two and five years. The probation term may not exceed ten years if the person is convicted of a second degree or first degree felony.

  • What is the length of deferred adjudication for fraudulent use or possession of credit card or debit card information in Texas? A person may avoid a conviction and be placed on deferred adjudication after pleading guilty or nolo contendere (“no contest”) to a judge.

    For a state jail felony, the deferred adjudication term will be between two and five years, with the possibility of extending it for up to ten years. For first degree, second degree, and third degree felonies, the deferred adjudication period may not exceed ten years.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO FRAUDULENT USE OR POSSESSION OF CREDIT CARD OR DEBIT CARD INFORMATION IN TEXAS?

The State, as part of its case, must show the accused possessed or acquired the credit or debit cards or other items with “intent to harm or defraud another.” A person on trial for fraudulent use or possession of credit card or debit card information may assert they lacked this requisite intent to commit the crime.

  • What is “the intent to harm or defraud”? The intent to harm or defraud is not defined in the Penal Code, but is given its plain meaning, and may be inferred from the circumstances and common sense.

    In Singh v. State, a defendant who was stalking a victim broke into her home. Police caught him with her mail, and computer drives. He had apparently opened an account with a credit monitoring company in her name, and was convicted of fraudulent use or possession of identifying information. The account application had the victim’s name, date of birth, address, and social security number. She testified she believed, based on her experience with the defendant, he intended to harm her, which was sufficient to uphold the conviction.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FRAUDULENT USE OR POSSESSION OF CREDIT CARD OR DEBIT CARD INFORMATION IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for fraudulent use or possession of credit card or debit card information is three years.

FRAUDULENT USE OR POSSESSION OF CREDIT CARD OR DEBIT CARD INFORMATION IN TEXAS

Texas law prohibits possessing another’s credit or debit card information with the intent to use it in any manner. The Texas Legislature enacted this law in 2019 to punish credit card skimming, and individuals found with multiple counterfeit cards and numerous account numbers of others.

TEXAS FRAUDULENT USE OR POSSESSION OF CREDIT CARD OR DEBIT CARD INFORMATION COURT CASES

The case law regarding fraudulent use or possession of credit or debit card information in Texas shows courts analyzing the criminalized conduct under charges for fraudulent use or possession of identifying information. The law against fraudulent use or possession of credit or debit card information is relatively new, so prosecuting offices charged the conduct under previously enacted laws.

  • In Ramirez-Memije v. State, the defendant received a credit card skimmer from one person, and delivered it to another in exchange for cash, who skimmed credit card numbers from customers at a restaurant before returning it to the defendant. The police caught the waiter who used the device, who then set up the defendant. When police seized the skimmer from the defendant, it contained several items of identifying information. At trial, despite the defendant’s assertion that he did not know the skimmer contained identifying information, a jury found him guilty.
FAQs; Knowledge is power. Get honest answers now.

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating