Texas Penal Code 33.023 – Electronic Data Tampering

WHAT IS ELECTRONIC DATA TAMPERING IN TEXAS?

The Texas law against electronic access interference prohibits altering data in transmission between two computers, and introducing ransomware onto another’s computer, computer network, or computer system through deception and without a legitimate business or law enforcement purpose.

Texas Penal Code 33.023 - Electronic Data Tampering

WHAT IS THE ELECTRONIC DATA TAMPERING LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 33.023. ELECTRONIC DATA TAMPERING.

(b) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally alters data as it transmits between two computers in a computer network or computer system through deception and without a legitimate business purpose.

(c) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally introduces ransomware onto a computer, computer network, or computer system through deception and without a legitimate business purpose.

(d) Subject to Subsections (d-1) and (d-2), an offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.

(d-1) Subject to Subsection (d-2), if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant acted with the intent to defraud or harm another, an offense under this section is:

(1) a Class C misdemeanor if the aggregate amount involved is less than $100 or cannot be determined;

(2) a Class B misdemeanor if the aggregate amount involved is $100 or more but less than $750;

(3) a Class A misdemeanor if the aggregate amount involved is $750 or more but less than $2,500;

(4) a state jail felony if the aggregate amount involved is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000;

(5) a felony of the third degree if the aggregate amount involved is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000;

(6) a felony of the second degree if the aggregate amount involved is $150,000 or more but less than $300,000; and

(7) a felony of the first degree if the aggregate amount involved is $300,000 or more.

(d-2) If it is shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant knowingly restricted a victim’s access to privileged information, an offense under this section is:

(1) a state jail felony if the value of the aggregate amount involved is less than $2,500;

(2) a felony of the third degree if:

(A) the value of the aggregate amount involved is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000; or

(B) a client or patient of a victim suffered harm attributable to the offense;

(3) a felony of the second degree if:

(A) the value of the aggregate amount involved is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000; or

(B) a client or patient of a victim suffered bodily injury attributable to the offense; and

(4) a felony of the first degree if:

(A) the value of the aggregate amount involved is $150,000 or more; or

(B) a client or patient of a victim suffered serious bodily injury or death attributable to the offense.

(e) When benefits are obtained, a victim is defrauded or harmed, or property is altered, appropriated, damaged, or deleted in violation of this section, whether or not in a single incident, the conduct may be considered as one offense and the value of the benefits obtained and of the losses incurred because of the fraud, harm, or alteration, appropriation, damage, or deletion of property may be aggregated in determining the grade of the offense.

(f) A person who is subject to prosecution under this section and any other section of this code may be prosecuted under either or both sections.

(g) Software is not ransomware for the purposes of this section if the software restricts access to data because:

(1) authentication is required to upgrade or access purchased content; or

(2) access to subscription content has been blocked for nonpayment.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR ELECTRONIC DATA TAMPERING IN TEXAS?

The penalty classification for electronic data tampering depends on whether the person obtains benefits or causes the victim to incur losses, whether the information restricted was privileged, and the aggregate amount of benefits obtained or losses incurred.

  • Class C misdemeanor, punishable by up to a $500 fine, if:
    • the aggregate amount involved is less than $100; or
    • there is no benefit or loss, or the aggregate amount cannot be determined;
  • Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in jail, if:
    • the aggregate amount involved is $100 or more but less than $750;
  • Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in jail, if:
    • the aggregate amount involved is $750 or more but less than $2,500;
  • State jail felony, punishable by 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, if:
    • the aggregate amount involved is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000; or
    • the person restricted access to privileged information, and the aggregate amount involved is less than $2,500;
  • Third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison, if:
    • the aggregate amount involved is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000; or
    • the person restricted access to privileged information, and:
      • the aggregate amount involved is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000; or
      • a client or patient suffered harm as a result;
  • Second degree felony, punishable by two to 20 years in prison, if:
    • the aggregate amount involved is $150,000 or more but less than $300,000; or
    • the person restricted access to privileged information, and:
      • the aggregate amount involved is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000; or
      • a client or patient suffered bodily injury as a result;
  • First degree felony, punishable by five to 99 years in prison, if:
    • the aggregate amount involved is $300,000 or more; or
    • the person restricted access to privileged information, and:
      • the aggregate amount involved is $150,00 or more; or
      • a client or patient suffered serious bodily injury or death as a result.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR ELECTRONIC DATA TAMPERING IN TEXAS?

The punishment range for electronic data tampering depends on the conduct, and aggregate amount of damage caused by the offense. The punishment ranges are:

  • First degree felony: five to 99 years or life in prison, maximum $10,000 fine;
  • Second degree felony: two to 20 years in prison, maximum $10,000 fine;
  • Third degree felony: two to ten years in prison, maximum $10,000 fine;
  • State jail felony: 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, maximum $10,000 fine;
  • Class A misdemeanor: up to one year in jail, maximum $4,000 fine;
  • Class B misdemeanor: up to 180 days in jail, maximum $2,000 fine;
  • Class C misdemeanor: maximum $500 fine.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR ELECTRONIC DATA TAMPERING IN TEXAS?

A person charged with electronic data tampering may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction. If charged with a first degree or second degree felony, the period of community supervision may not exceed ten years. Third degree electronic data tampering charges carry a probation range of two to five years, and the period of deferred adjudication may not exceed ten years.

A person charged with electronic data tampering as a state jail felony may be placed on community supervision for a period between two and five years, with the possibility of extending supervision for up to ten years.

The period of community supervision for Class A and Class B misdemeanor electronic data tampering charges may not exceed two years, and a person may be placed on deferred adjudication for up to 180 days if charged with a Class C misdemeanor.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO ELECTRONIC DATA TAMPERING IN TEXAS?

The statute does not authorize specific defenses to electronic data tampering, but does clarify that it is legally permissible to restrict access to data because: (1) authentication is required to upgrade or access purchased content; or (2) access to subscription content has been blocked for non-payment.

  • What is ransomware? Texas law defines “ransomware” as a computer contaminant or lock used by an unauthorized person to restrict access to a computer, computer system, or computer network, or any data therein under circumstances in which the person demands money, property, or a service to remove the computer contaminant or lock, restore access, or otherwise remediate the impact of the contaminant or lock.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC DATA TAMPERING IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for electronic data tampering categorized as a misdemeanor is two years. If the offense is a felony, the limitation period is three years.

ELECTRONIC DATA TAMPERING IN TEXAS

Electronic data tampering punishes unauthorized interruption or suspension of access to a computer system or network without the effective consent of the owner. Such conduct includes the use of ransomware, “Denial-of-Service” attacks, and other cybercrimes. The offense does not include interruptions or suspensions for a legitimate business or law enforcement purpose, or for system updates and subscription non-payment.

FAQs; Knowledge is power. Get honest answers now.

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating