Texas Penal Code 38.10 – Bail Jumping and Failure to Appear
WHAT IS BAIL JUMPING AND FAILURE TO APPEAR IN TEXAS?
The Texas law against bail jumping or failure to appear prohibits refusing to appear when required to do so after being released from custody.
WHAT IS THE BAIL JUMPING AND FAILURE TO APPEAR LAW IN TEXAS?
Tex. Penal Code § 38.10. BAIL JUMPING AND FAILURE TO APPEAR.
(a) A person lawfully released from custody, with or without bail, on condition that he subsequently appear commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly fails to appear in accordance with the terms of his release.
(b) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the appearance was incident to community supervision, parole, or an intermittent sentence.
(c) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor had a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear in accordance with the terms of his release.
(d) Except as provided in Subsections (e) and (f), an offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
(e) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor if the offense for which the actor’s appearance was required is punishable by fine only.
(f) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree if the offense for which the actor’s appearance was required is classified as a felony.
WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR BAIL JUMPING AND FAILURE TO APPEAR IN TEXAS?
The penalty classification for bail jumping or failing to appear corresponds to the offense for which a person’s appearance is required. If the person fails to appear for a Class C misdemeanor or other offense punishable by fine only, the bail jumping and failing to appear is a Class C misdemeanor.
If the offense for which the person fails to appear is a felony, bail jumping is a third degree felony, punishable by two to ten years in prison. In all other circumstances, bail jumping and failing to appear is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail.
WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR BAIL JUMPING AND FAILURE TO APPEAR IN TEXAS?
A person charged with third degree felony bail jumping or failing to appear faces between two and ten years in prison, and a maximum $10,000 fine. Bail jumping or failure to appear charged as a Class A misdemeanor carries up to one year in jail, and a maximum $4,000 fine. If charged as a Class C misdemeanor, it is punishable by a maximum fine of $500.
WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR BAIL JUMPING AND FAILURE TO APPEAR IN TEXAS?
A person charged with bail jumping or failure to appear may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction. The maximum term of community supervision for third degree felony bail jumping or failing to appear is ten years. The community supervision term for a Class A misdemeanor may not exceed two years, and may be up to 180 days for a Class C misdemeanor.
WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO BAIL JUMPING AND FAILURE TO APPEAR IN TEXAS?
The statute does not authorize specific defenses to bail jumping or failing to appear. A person accused thereof may attempt to negate at least one of the elements the State must prove at trial.
WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR BAIL JUMPING AND FAILURE TO APPEAR IN TEXAS?
The limitation period for third degree felony bail jumping or failure to appear is three years. For bail jumping categorized as a Class A or Class C misdemeanor, the limitation period is two years.
BAIL JUMPING AND FAILURE TO APPEAR IN TEXAS
The purpose of the law against bail jumping is to ensure a person is physically present for trial and other required court appearances for a pending criminal charge. A bail bond is a promise to appear, and a person may be charged for refusing to appear after each conditional release.
TEXAS BAIL JUMPING AND FAILURE TO APPEAR COURT CASES
The case law regarding bail jumping and failing to appear in Texas shows that courts construe the statute broadly. Failing to report to a court setting or other specified location, such as a county jail after a bond revocation hearing, constitutes bail jumping.
- In Timmins v. State, the defendant’s bond was revoked when he appeared in court, but the judge who revoked his bond let him escort his mother home before reporting to the jail. He failed to report to the jail, and was charged and convicted of bail jumping. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed his conviction. The defendant had been released from custody, and committed the offense of bail jumping or failure to appear when he did not report to the jail.
- In Kuykendall v. State, the defendant was on bond for two offenses, and was required to appear on the same date to the same courtroom for both charges. After he knowingly failed to appear, he was convicted of two bail jumping charges in addition to his original offenses.
The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, holding the “allowable unit of prosecution” is the “number of discrete conditional releases” for which a person is required to appear and failed to do so. Although he only missed one court date, two bail jumping convictions were proper because he was on two separate conditional releases.
Glowing Client Reviews
Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!
I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.
Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.
I really appreciated all he did for me.
Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.
He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!
Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.
Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.
He saved my career. Forever grateful!
Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.
He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15
Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+
Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DWI 2nd
Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.
Contact Trey Porter Today
Request a free consultation
The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.
If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.
