Texas Penal Code 38.03 – Resisting Arrest, Search, or Transportation

WHAT IS RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR TRANSPORTATION IN TEXAS?

The Texas law against resisting arrest, search, or transportation prohibits using force against a peace officer to prevent or obstruct the peace officer from arresting, searching, or transporting either the person or someone else.

Texas Penal Code 38.03 - Resisting Arrest, Search, or Transportation

WHAT IS THE RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR TRANSPORTATION LAW IN TEXAS?

Tex. Penal Code § 38.03. RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR TRANSPORTATION.

(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally prevents or obstructs a person he knows is a peace officer or a person acting in a peace officer’s presence and at his direction from effecting an arrest, search, or transportation of the actor or another by using force against the peace officer or another.

(b) It is no defense to prosecution under this section that the arrest or search was unlawful.

(c) Except as provided in Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

(d) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree if the actor uses a deadly weapon to resist the arrest or search.

WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR TRANSPORTATION IN TEXAS?

Resisting arrest, search, or transportation is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail. It is enhanced to a third degree felony, which is punishable by two to ten years in prison, if the person uses a deadly weapon to resist.

WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR TRANSPORTATION IN TEXAS?

A person charged with Class A misdemeanor resisting arrest, search, or transportation faces up to one year in jail, and a maximum $4,000 fine. If the resisting charge is a third degree felony, it carries between two and ten years in prison, and a maximum $10,000 fine.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR TRANSPORTATION IN TEXAS?

A person charged with resisting arrest, search, or transportation may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction. The period of community supervision for resisting arrest, search, or transportation charged as a Class A misdemeanor may not exceed two years, and may be up to ten years for a third degree felony.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR TRANSPORTATION IN TEXAS?

The justification defenses are available to a person accused of resisting arrest, search, or transportation. If a person admits to resisting, but proves he reasonably believed resisting was immediately necessary to avoid imminent harm, a jury may find the conduct was justified as necessary.

  • Can a person resist arrest in Texas if police use excessive force? Texas Penal Code Section 9.31, the law of self-defense, applies in prosecutions for resisting arrest, search, or transportation if, before the person resisted, the officer or a person acting at the officer’s direction used “greater force than necessary.” The accused must also prove he reasonably believed using force to resist was immediately necessary to protect himself against the officer’s abuse.In Bowen v. State, the defendant was on trial for resisting arrest. She testified the officers kicked her legs out from under her, and pinned her to the ground with their knees on her back. She said she only struggled because she could not breathe, felt her arm pop out of its socket, and was screaming for help. She kicked one of the officers when they lifted her up, but claimed it was only because they were hurting her and she was trying to regain her balance. The defendant was entitled to both a self-defense and necessity defense instruction under these circumstances.
  • Can a person resist an illegal arrest in Texas? Texas law clarifies that an unlawful search or arrest—one unsupported by reasonable suspicion or probable cause—is “no defense.” In other words, even if a person believes a police officer has no probable cause for the arrest, the person is not legally permitted to fight with or use force against the officer (as long as the officer is not using excessive force).
  • What are examples of resisting arrest, search, or transportation in Texas? To convict a person of resisting, the State must show the person used force. Courts have interpreted this as any act of violence, physical aggression, or an immediate threat thereof. The force must also be directed at the arresting officer.In Haliburton v. State, the Second Court of Appeals of Texas upheld a resisting conviction for a defendant who kicked at an officer without making contact.

    However, in Dobbs v. State, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals decided that holding a gun to one’s own head to prevent officers from arresting him is not sufficient to support a resisting conviction.

WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR TRANSPORTATION IN TEXAS?

The limitation period for resisting arrest, search, or transportation categorized as a Class A misdemeanor is two years. If it is a third degree felony, the limitation period is three years.

RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR TRANSPORTATION IN TEXAS

Resisting arrest, search, or transportation requires using some force in opposition to, in the direction of, or in contact with an officer in order to prevent an arrest, search, or transport. However, Texas courts recognize the importance of protecting police officers in most situations, especially when they are attempting to effectuate a legal arrest.

TEXAS RESISTING ARREST, SEARCH, OR TRANSPORTATION COURT CASES

The case law regarding resisting arrest, search, or transportation in Texas shows the willingness of Texas courts to accept minimal uses of “force” to support a resisting conviction.

  • In Finley v. State, the defendant was convicted of resisting arrest for “pulling away” from officers attempting to arrest him. The officers described the defendant’s conduct as clenching up, and trying to pull his arm away. Thus, even though the defendant was not violent or physically aggressive towards the officer, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that his act of pulling away was “in opposition or hostility to” the arresting officer. That constitutes sufficient force as required by the statute.

Resources & information

Frequently asked questions

Glowing Client Reviews

Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!

Joey

I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.

Wendy

Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.

I really appreciated all he did for me.

Juan

Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.

He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!

Binda

Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.

Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.

He saved my career. Forever grateful!

Stevie

Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.

He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.

Alina

Read More Reviews

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15

Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+

Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DWI 2nd

Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.

CHARGES DISMISSED

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.

Contact Trey Porter Today

Request a free consultation

The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.

If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.

Google Rating Avvo Rating