Texas Penal Code 38.17 – Failure to Stop or Report Aggravated Sexual Assault of Child
WHAT IS FAILURE TO STOP OR REPORT AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD IN TEXAS?
The Texas law against failure to stop or report aggravated sexual assault of a child punishes anyone who observes clear indications that a child is being sexually abused or is about to be sexually abused and does not report it to law enforcement immediately.
WHAT IS THE FAILURE TO STOP OR REPORT AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD LAW IN TEXAS?
Tex. Penal Code § 38.17. FAILURE TO STOP OR REPORT AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD.
(a) A person, other than a person who has a relationship with a child described by Section 22.04(b), commits an offense if:
(1) the actor observes the commission or attempted commission of an offense prohibited by Section 21.02 or 22.021(a)(2)(B) under circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that an offense of a sexual or assaultive nature was being committed or was about to be committed against the child;
(2) the actor fails to assist the child or immediately report the commission of the offense to a peace officer or law enforcement agency; and
(3) the actor could assist the child or immediately report the commission of the offense without placing the actor in danger of suffering serious bodily injury or death.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
WHAT IS THE PENALTY CLASS FOR FAILURE TO STOP OR REPORT AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD IN TEXAS?
Failure to report an aggravated sexual assault of a child is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in county jail.
WHAT IS THE PUNISHMENT RANGE FOR FAILURE TO STOP OR REPORT AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD IN TEXAS?
The punishment range for failing to report an aggravated sexual assault of a child, a Class A misdemeanor, is up to one year in jail, and a maximum $4,000 fine.
WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO STOP OR REPORT AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD IN TEXAS?
A person charged with failure to stop or report aggravated sexual assault of a child may be eligible for probation after a conviction, or deferred adjudication without a conviction, for a period not to exceed two years.
WHAT ARE THE DEFENSES TO FAILURE TO STOP OR REPORT AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD IN TEXAS?
The statute only punishes people for failing to stop or report sexual assaults against children if they could have done so without placing the child in danger of serious bodily injury or death. A person accused of failing to stop or report aggravated sexual assault of a child may argue he or she could not have acted without placing the child in more danger.
- Is person not related to a child victim of sexual abuse required to report the abuse in Texas? Texas law requires everyone who observes a child being sexually abused to stop or report the conduct, regardless of their relation to the child. In fact, the statute specifically excepts those who have a legal or statutory duty to act, and those who have assumed care, custody, or control of the child from punishment under this statute—people who have that relationship with the child and fail to stop or report sexual abuse are subject to felony punishment under Section 22.04.
WHAT IS THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR FAILURE TO STOP OR REPORT AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD IN TEXAS?
The limitation period for failing to stop or report aggravated sexual assault of a child, a Class A misdemeanor, is two years.
FAILURE TO STOP OR REPORT AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD IN TEXAS
Texas law encourages citizens to protect children by criminalizing the failure to stop or report aggravated sexual assault of a child. The ultimate goal is to prevent horrific crimes against children, and punish those who victimize them.
TEXAS FAILURE TO STOP OR REPORT AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A CHILD COURT CASES
The case law regarding failure to stop or report aggravated sexual assault of a child in Texas explains the evidence permitted to be used against a person in a criminal prosecution.
- In Bradford v. State, the defendant and her child’s father were involved in a custody dispute after the father allegedly sexually abused the child in 2012. The 2012 allegations were reported. In 2014, the father picked up the child from school, and the defendant went to police to seek help locating the child. She told police that father had sexually abused three weeks prior, and was convicted of failing to report the abuse. The appellate court reversed, holding the only evidence of the defendant’s failure to report abuse was her own out-of-court admission, which she denied saying during trial.
Glowing Client Reviews
Trey is the man! I hired him because I had overheard a county court judge mentioning how awesome of an attorney he is, so if an endorsement from a judge won’t convince you then I’m not sure what will. I sure do hope I never find myself in a pickle ever again but if I do, I would hire Trey in a heartbeat. He’s honest, transparent, doesn’t beat around the bush, and will work tirelessly so that your clean record stays clean and unblemished. 5 stars, highly recommend!
I recently hired Trey Porter Law to help our teenage daughter with a drug charge. In the state of Texas she was being charged as an adult which carried a much stiffer penalty. Trey is very responsive, helpful, knowledgeable and is always available to answer any questions or concerns via phone, text or email. He was able to negotiate on her behalf so it was a pleasant experience. I would highly recommend Trey Porter Law.
Trey really helped me out. He was straight forward and professional, and really helped me in my case. I thought i was going to lose my job, but trey did everything in his power to help me keep my way of life, and still keeps up with me any details on my case.
I really appreciated all he did for me.
Trey is a phenomenal attorney that gets the job done right! He is dedicated to help his clients.
He made himself available and answered all my concerns immediately! I had faith in him and he continued to prove his expertise by helping me. I highly recommend Trey Porter!!
Trey Porter fought for me! I am a nurse and thought my career was over.
Very thankful I got Trey Porter involved. He responds to messages regularly and was very thorough.
He saved my career. Forever grateful!
Mr Porter is the real deal. You get what you pay for these days. I know that from my personal business dealings. Attorney Trey Porter was no different.
He was prompt, professional and poised. I was charged with DWI, and Mr Porter got the charge dismissed. I could not be more pleased or thankful. If you get a DWI, hire the best — hire Trey Porter.
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
WE FIGHT FOR DISMISSAL
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15
Driving facts involved failing to maintain a single lane and speeding. Client refused breath test and forced law enforcement to obtain search warrant for blood. Blood test result was not used after challenge from Defense, and State waived and abandoned charge.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client was a college student, worried about the collateral consequences of an alcohol offense. After negotiation and review of the traffic stop, the case was dismissed. Client received no criminal conviction. The charge was later expunged and deleted from client’s record.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED .15+
Client was involved in minor accident. Client was at fault in accident. A young executive, client was concerned that a criminal conviction for DWI would result in termination. After review of the traffic stop, it was clear the officer lacked probable cause for arrest. State eventually dismissed DWI charge. Client received no criminal conviction.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DWI 2nd
Client, a military veteran, was facing up to one year in jail. State could not prove intoxication by alcohol, and was prepared to proceed on loss of use by marijuana. After challenging the State to prove that marijuana was ingested at or near time of driving, and that marijuana impaired client’s driving, the State dismissed the case on the day of trial.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Driving facts involved a false claim by police that taillight was out. After challenging the reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop, the State was forced to dismiss the case when video did not match police report. Client has since expunged arrest, and has no criminal record.
CHARGES DISMISSED
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Client is a public school teacher and faced immediate termination upon conviction. The facts of the case were bad. State was unwilling to budge in negotiation, and matter was set for trial – the last shot at avoiding a conviction and preserving client’s livelihood. State was forced to dismiss on day of trial. Client has no criminal record, and has since expunged the DWI arrest.
Contact Trey Porter Today
Request a free consultation
The stakes are high. Criminal charges can have devastating, lifelong consequences. During the free, confidential consultation, Mr. Porter will answer questions surrounding your legal matter, and discuss and identify potential defenses.
If you have been arrested and charged with a crime, the State is working on your conviction. It’s time to start building your defense.
